Il 14/02/2018 10:18, Luigi Cirillo ha scritto:
Sometimes (not always but often) it happens one of the two vassals is
never ready to accept requests. Following the logs, in this case
djangoapp_uwsgi.ini doesn't accept requests.
Do you know how I can obtain info about where uwsgi get stuck?
I'd
Sorry, I didn't received your reply. No, it is not in the spam :)
Anyway this is the vassal log:
**
*** Starting uWSGI 2.0.16 (64bit) on [Wed Feb 14 11:40:01 2018] ***
compiled with version: 6.3.0 20170516 on 14
Sometimes (not always but often) it happens one of the two vassals is
never ready to accept requests. Following the logs, in this case
djangoapp_uwsgi.ini doesn't accept requests.
Do you know how I can obtain info about where uwsgi get stuck?
;uWSGI instance configuration
[uwsgi]
ini =
> On Feb 14, 2018, at 1:08 PM, jonathan vanasco wrote:
>
> also, it might be worth adding to the “ThinkToKnow” docs that if you’re doing
> anything with oAuth against twitter or Facebook, you should increase the
> buffer size. one (or more) platforms had some recent
we have a few HTTP endpoints that have very large request payloads (headers +
query string). They’re all oAuth endpoints coming in from 3rd parties, with a
bunch of header data and a super long query string.
the quick fix was to double buffer-size to 8192
is this the best approach?
also,