It just seems odd that there's no way to detect them being missing and
throw an exception that actually gives some information about the problem
or even regenerate the contents of the file at the cost of startup speed.
--Zac
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 4:40 AM, 'Daniel Vogelheim' via v8-dev <
v8-dev@g
ed by d8. You are
> confusing it with the startup snapshot.
>
> Yang
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016, 22:55 Zac Hansen wrote:
>
>> It just seems odd that there's no way to detect them being missing and
>> throw an exception that actually gives some information about the problem
&
Can you give me a hint or two of behaviors to look for for my testing?
The warnings I'm seeing about the performance implications of changing the
prototype on an existing object are wide ranging including things that one
wouldn't normally think of.
I'm scared that I'll test what I think I want to
I can see where you are coming from even if I don't agree, but that doesn't
seem to preclude adding the `explicit operator bool`, does it? Just that
alone would get me 95% of what I want.
I'd suggest adding it to maybe, as well, I think.
--Zac
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Jakob Kummerow
wr
along the lines of:
>
>>
>> Local<...> result;
>> if (v8::JSON::Parse(...).ToLocal(&result)) {
>> result->Set(...);
>> }
>
>
> Would that be succinct enough for you, or is it the lack of type deduction
> of result that is the problem?
