Thank you very much.
I have tried in gyp file:
'cflags': [
'-L/fullpath',
'-l*',
],
But it dosen‘t work.
On Monday, September 22, 2014 1:05:24 PM UTC+8, Flying Jester wrote:
You should ask on the Chromium (or very maybe the V8-dev) lists.
It will likely involve
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 8:16 AM, ksakam...@chromium.org wrote:
[...] V8 has --use_strict command line flag which enables strict mode
globally, but we want to enforce strict mode only on worker scripts. Is
there any way to achieve this?
Currently, no: All our flags are global variables, and
Thank you for the quick reply!
Filed a bug: https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=3588
2014-09-22 15:59 GMT+09:00 Sven Panne svenpa...@chromium.org:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 8:16 AM, ksakam...@chromium.org wrote:
[...] V8 has --use_strict command line flag which enables strict mode
This may also make some library devs happy (link http://koajs.com/ as an
example)
On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 6:39:40 AM UTC-4, Andy Wingo wrote:
[FYI +blink-dev]
ES6 defines a new language feature, generator functions [1].
ES6 generator functions have been shipping in Firefox since
Once again, I'm not sure either way about if I have a CLA signature on
record. So far, I have heard two different stories, and this is the main
reason I've kinda trailed off in my interest in this project. Could I get
some verification either way, conclusively?
--
--
v8-users mailing list
It optimizes integers for 32 bits because there is little reason to
optimize integers for anything else when the ECMAScript specification
itself makes no mention of 64-bit integers, only 32-bit ones beyond smaller
sizes for typed arrays.
On Sunday, September 21, 2014 12:03:18 PM UTC-4, Si
Once everything gets migrated, what all needs changed on the local side?
On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:09:42 AM UTC-4, Michael Achenbach wrote:
Hi!
We're planning to migrate the V8 sources from Svn to Git. The estimated
timeline for this is 1-2 month.
We won't migrate before all known
As I've told you before [1], you have signed it. Twice. Any other questions?
[1] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/v8-users/FcaO80-pY6s/pcc-KyyO3IMJ
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Isiah Meadows impinb...@gmail.com wrote:
Once again, I'm not sure either way about if I have a CLA signature on
What I need to do for a specific unit test is to run a specific method +
arguments, and if it takes too long, stop the call mid-cycle and fail the
test. This is for a performance-related unit test for my patch (which is a
perf patch itself, anyways). Is this possible, and if so, how would I do
