> As to the problem itself, I have a clarifying questions: doesn't Blink
already have some choke point to determine whether it's "ok to call script
now"? If so that'd be a more natural place to add this handling than
TryCatch.
No, there isn't such a point. To make matters worse, some call-sites
Hi,
I'm trying to retrieve the instruction pointer information when I run a d8
with JS program.
For example, $v8/out.gn/x64_release/d8 foo.js.
I realize that there is a tool 'objdump_v8' in the v8/tools folder.
If anyone can help me how can I use the objdump with d8 or any other method
Adding a couple more V8 folks who may have thoughts.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:59 AM Kentaro Hara wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:10 AM Yuki Shiino
> wrote:
>
>> +adamk, cbruni to get more attention from V8 team. This needs V8 team's
>> support.
>>
>> Actually, I intended haraken's (a3) at
LGTM3
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 9:16 AM 'Mathias Bynens' via blink-dev <
blink-...@chromium.org> wrote:
> LGTM2
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:44 AM Sathya Gunasekaran
> wrote:
>
>> LGTM
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:20 AM Frank Tang wrote:
>>
>>> Spec
>>>
>>>
LGTM2
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:44 AM Sathya Gunasekaran
wrote:
> LGTM
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:20 AM Frank Tang wrote:
>
>> Spec
>>
>> https://tc39.github.io/proposal-intl-list-format
>>
>> Summary
>>
>> A Stage 3 proposal that introduces a new formatter under Intl.
>>
>> Intl.ListFormat
LGTM
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:20 AM Frank Tang wrote:
> Spec
>
> https://tc39.github.io/proposal-intl-list-format
>
> Summary
>
> A Stage 3 proposal that introduces a new formatter under Intl.
>
> Intl.ListFormat helps libraries and frameworks format a list in a
> localized fashion by
You can do the equivalent to the "jlh" gdb macro:
https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/v8/tools/gdbinit?l=16
In your case:
_v8_internal_Print_Object(*((v8::internal::Object**)source.val_))
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 4:07 AM Early wrote:
> Any helps, thanks
>
>
> On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:10 AM Yuki Shiino wrote:
> +adamk, cbruni to get more attention from V8 team. This needs V8 team's
> support.
>
> Actually, I intended haraken's (a3) at my proposal (a), but I'm afraid
> that changing an existing API HasCaught() would break backward
> compatibility.
+adamk, cbruni to get more attention from V8 team. This needs V8 team's
support.
Actually, I intended haraken's (a3) at my proposal (a), but I'm afraid that
changing an existing API HasCaught() would break backward compatibility.
So, I'm also proposing to add a new V8 API like
Thanks, I got it :)
My proposal would be:
(a3) Make HasCaught() return true when the isolate is terminated.
I'm not sure if (a) or (a2) is a good idea because the fact that we didn't
call ReThrow() means that we (intentionally) suppressed the exception.
Thoughts?
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 9:51
10 matches
Mail list logo
