Re: [blink-dev] Re: [v8-dev] Re: [v8-users] Intent to Ship: Intl.Segmenter

> >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 1:16 AM Ross Kirsling >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:05 AM Frank Tang wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2

Re: [v8-dev] Re: [v8-users] Intent to Ship: Intl.Segmenter

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 1:15 AM Ross Kirsling wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:05 AM Frank Tang wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 1:33 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 1:10 AM

Re: [v8-dev] Re: [v8-users] Intent to Ship: Intl.Segmenter

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 1:33 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 1:10 AM Frank Tang wrote: > >> For m87 >> >> Contact emailsft...@chromium.org, s...@chromium.org >> >> Explainer >> https://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-segmenter &g

[v8-users] Intent to Ship: Intl.Segmenter

For m87 Contact emailsft...@chromium.org, s...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-segmenter Specificationhttps://tc39.github.io/proposal-intl-segmenter/ Design docs

[v8-users] Intent to Prototype: Intl.Segmenter

[Note: Resent due to message header problem. Sorry]Contact emails ft...@chromium.org, s...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-segmenter Specificationhttps://tc39.github.io/proposal-intl-segmenter/ Design docs

[v8-users] Intent to Prototype: Intl.Segmenter

Contact emailsft...@chromium.org, s...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-segmenter Specificationhttps://tc39.github.io/proposal-intl-segmenter/ Design docs https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xugLpLmgRFnNXK8ztariTAbD2IXueDw1T3VNuuZCz8k/edit#heading=h.xgjl2srtytjt

[v8-users] Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Add fractionalSecondDigits option to Intl.DateTimeFormat

ping On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 3:05 PM Mounir Lamouri wrote: > non-owner LGTM based on the above. 2 out of the 3 ICU bugs were pointed by > Mozilla in their bug tracker as a reason to not launch yet. > > -- Mounir > > On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 14:59, Frank Tang wrote: > &g

[v8-users] Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Add fractionalSecondDigits option to Intl.DateTimeFormat

nge? It looks like the PR is >> still open and not much has happened since last autumn. Preferably there >> should be an agreed upon spec before something is changes, or at the very >> least, the spec change and the shipping should happen close to each other. >> >> /Dani

[v8-users] Re: Intent to Ship: Add fractionalSecondDigits option to Intl.DateTimeFormat

ping On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:50 PM Frank Tang wrote: > Contact emails ft...@chromium.org,js...@chromium.org Explainer > http://shorturl.at/adiZ4 Spec https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/347 TAG > review No TAG review since the TC39 and ECMA402 will cover that. Summary

[v8-users] Intent to Ship: Add fractionalSecondDigits option to Intl.DateTimeFormat

Contact emails ft...@chromium.org,js...@chromium.org Explainer http://shorturl.at/adiZ4 Spec https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/347 TAG review No TAG review since the TC39 and ECMA402 will cover that. Summary Enhance the Intl.DateTimeFormat API by adding a “ fractionalSecondDigits” option to

[v8-users] Re: FW: Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Intl.DisplayNames

024f168cc7#diff-738bf168ca04c8cfc21d0903825cb5c9> > . > > ‪On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 1:49 AM ‫امیرحسین‬‎ > wrote:‬ > >> >> >> >> >> از گوشی هوشمند Samsung Galaxy ارسال شده است. >> >> >> پیام اصلی ---- >> از: امیرحسین >>

[v8-users] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Intl.DisplayNames

:16 AM PhistucK wrote: > It is pending review, so not going to stage 3 just yet. > > ☆*PhistucK* > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 8:07 PM Frank Tang wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 10:05 AM Frank Tang wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan

[v8-users] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Intl.DisplayNames

On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 10:05 AM Frank Tang wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 11:21 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 7:49 PM Frank Tang wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 10:34 AM Frank Tang wro

[v8-users] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Intl.DisplayNames

On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 11:21 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 7:49 PM Frank Tang wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 10:34 AM Frank Tang wrote: >> >>> still need one more >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 12:12

[v8-users] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Intl.DisplayNames

On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 10:34 AM Frank Tang wrote: > still need one more > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 12:12 PM Chris Harrelson > wrote: > >> LGTM2 >> >> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 12:01 PM Daniel Bratell >> wrote: >> >>> LGTM1 >>>

[v8-users] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Intl.DisplayNames

still need one more On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 12:12 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 12:01 PM Daniel Bratell > wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> >> /Daniel >> >> >> On 2019-12-26 23:03, Frank Tang wrote: >> >> &g

[v8-users] Intent to Ship: Intl.DisplayNames

Contact emails ft...@chromium.org,js...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-displaynames Spec https://tc39.github.io/proposal-intl-displaynames/ TAG review A small JavaScript features, a TAG review is not required, as TC39 already provide significant technical oversight.

[v8-users] Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intend to Ship: Add calendar options/patterns and other calendars

019 at 1:06 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: > Also, v8 intents do in fact go through the Blink API owners process. > Please don't ship until there are 3 LGTMs. > > LGTM1 > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:40 PM Frank Tang wrote: > >> To clarify these 3 PRs are considered by both ECMA40

[v8-users] Re: Intend to Ship: Add calendar options/patterns and other calendars

link-dev/HFOWIjSBKWQ/XZnslmWsAQAJ These three PRs was once only 1 PR and later got split into 3 PRs. so the original I2I cover all of them. On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 1:11 PM Frank Tang wrote: > These three ECMA402 PRs are intertwined and need to be considered to ship > together instead of three d

[v8-users] Intend to Ship: Add calendar options/patterns and other calendars

These three ECMA402 PRs are intertwined and need to be considered to ship together instead of three different one: #175 Add calendar and numberingSystem options #349 Allow calendar to determine choice of pattern #351 Permit relatedYear and yearName in output Spec

Re: [v8-users] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Let all early errors be SyntaxErrors

Is this feature controlled by a flag. I try to roll test262 and got a lot of errors related to this now. On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 12:07 PM Adam Klein wrote: > Hi Yoav, > > We don't have existing metrics that would help here, and I honestly don't > even know what we would track for this specific

[v8-users] Re: Intent to Implement: Add quarter option for Intl.DateTimeFormat

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 3:33 PM Frank Tang wrote: > Contact emails ft...@chromium.org,js...@chromium.org Explainer > https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/345 > Adam suggested I add an explainer, here you go shorturl.at/aeoq1 Design docs/spec https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/345 T

[v8-users] Intent to Implement: Add dayPeriod option for Intl.DateTimeFormat

Contact emails ft...@chromium.org,js...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/346 Design docs/spec Specification: https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/346 https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/346 TAG review No TAG review needed since it is part of TC39 ECMA402 Summary Add

[v8-users] Intent to Implement: Add quarter option for Intl.DateTimeFormat

Contact emails ft...@chromium.org,js...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/345 Design docs/spec https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/345 TAG review Discus under ECMA402 / TC39. No need for TAG Review. Summary Add quarter option to Intl.DateTimeFormat so the caller can

[v8-users] Intent to Implement: Intl.NumberFormat Unified API Proposal

Title: Intent to Implement: Intl.NumberFormat Unified API Proposal Contact emails ft...@chromium.com, s...@chromium.com Explainer https://github.com/tc39/proposal-unified-intl-numberformat

[v8-users] Re: [blink-dev] Re: [v8-dev] Re: Intent to Implement: Intl.DisplayNames API Proposal

r filling up what > could sometimes be simple forms that were simply internationalized. > Pseudo-code example - > > State/province: > > > > > ☆*PhistucK* > > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 5:03 AM Frank Tang wrote: > >> >> >> On

[v8-users] Intent to Implement: "numberingSystem" option for Intl.NumberFormat / "calendar" and "numberingSystem" option for Intl.DateTimeFormat

Contact emails ft...@chromium.org,js...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/175 Design docs/spec Specification: https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/175 https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/175 TAG review No need for TAG review since the TC39 / ECMA402 process provide

[v8-users] Re: [v8-dev] Re: Intent to Implement: Intl.DisplayNames API Proposal

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 6:56 PM 'Frank Tang (譚永鋒)' via v8-dev < v8-...@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > *From: *Mathias Bynens > *Date: *Mon, 13 May 2019 at 18:08 > *To: *Frank Tang > *Cc: *v8-users, blink-dev, Adam Klein, Frank Yung-Fong Tang, Sathya > Gunasekaran, Neb

[v8-users] Intent to Implement: Intl.DisplayNames API Proposal

Title: Intent to Implement: Intl.DisplayNames API Proposal Contact emails ft...@chromium.com Explainer https://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-displaynames https://tc39.github.io/proposal-intl-displaynames/ Design doc/Spec Engineering Plan https://goo.gl/im9wy4 Summary Provides a new

[v8-users] Re: Intent to Ship: Add formatRange / formatRangeToParts to DateTimeFormat

to: blink-api-owners-disc...@chromium.org On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:22 PM Frank Tang wrote: > Intend to ship for Chrome m76 > > > Title: Intent to Ship: Add formatRange / formatRangeToParts to > DateTimeFormat > > > Contact emails > > ft...@chromium.com, fabal

[v8-users] Intent to Ship: Add formatRange / formatRangeToParts to DateTimeFormat

Intend to ship for Chrome m76 Title: Intent to Ship: Add formatRange / formatRangeToParts to DateTimeFormat Contact emails ft...@chromium.com, fabal...@chromium.com Explainer https://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-DateTimeFormat-formatRange

[v8-users] Re: Intend to Ship: Locale sensitive BigInt.prototype.toLocaleString & allow Intl.NumberFormat format/formatToParts to take BigInt

uot;group", value: ","}, // {type: "integer", value: "01"}, // {type: "group", value: ","}, // {type: "integer", value: "23"}, // {type: "group", value: ","}, // {type: "integer", value: &quo

[v8-users] Intend to Ship: Locale sensitive BigInt.prototype.toLocaleString & allow Intl.NumberFormat format/formatToParts to take BigInt

*Intend to Ship: Locale sensitive BigInt.prototype.toLocaleString & allow Intl.NumberFormat format/formatToParts to take BigInt* Spec https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/236 Summary A Stage 3 Pull Request to change the ECMA402 that support locale sensitive BigInt.prototype.toLocaleString to

[v8-users] Re: Intend to Ship: DateTimeFormat dateStyle & timeStyle options

so now the m75 branch off. Any one willing to second the shipping of DateTimeFormat dateStyle & timeStyle options? On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 4:02 PM Frank Tang wrote: > Since that missed the April 5 m75 Feature Freeze day and we are a week > away from the April 18 m75 branch off date

[v8-users] Re: Intend to Ship: DateTimeFormat dateStyle & timeStyle options

GTM > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:13 PM Sathya Gunasekaran > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 7:41 AM Frank Tang wrote: >> >>> Spec >>> >>> https://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-datetime-style/ >>> >>> Summary &g

[v8-users] Intend to Ship: DateTimeFormat dateStyle & timeStyle options

Spec https://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-datetime-style/ Summary A Stage 3 proposal that adds two options to Intl.DateTimeFormat: dateStyle and timeStyle. These options give a compact way to request the appropriate, locale-specific way to ask for a date and time of given lengths Example let

[v8-users] Re: Intent to ship: Intl.Locale

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:42 AM Adam Klein wrote: > LGTM to ship, one note inline > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:59 PM Frank Tang (譚永鋒) wrote: > >> Spec >> >> https://tc39.github.io/proposal-intl-locale/ >> >> Summary >> >> A Stage 3 pro

[v8-users] Fwd: [v8-dev] Intent to ship: Intl.Locale

FYI- My first attempt sent from ft...@google.com got bounced back. Trying to forward from ft...@chromium.org. Sorry for the DUP -- Forwarded message - From: 'Frank Tang (譚永鋒)' via v8-dev Date: Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:59 PM Subject: [v8-dev] Intent to ship: Intl.Locale

[v8-users] Intent to ship: Intl.ListFormat

Spec https://tc39.github.io/proposal-intl-list-format Summary A Stage 3 proposal that introduces a new formatter under Intl. Intl.ListFormat helps libraries and frameworks format a list in a localized fashion by providing internationalized messages using a customary local word or phrase when

[v8-users] Intent to ship: Intl.RelativeTimeFormat

Spec https://tc39.github.io/proposal-intl-relative-time/ Summary A Stage 3 proposal that introduces a new formatter under Intl. Intl.RelativeTimeFormat is a low level API to facilitate libraries and frameworks to format relative time in a localized fashion by providing internationalized