Hi all,
due to various issues and limitations with type marshalling of
dbus-glib, I've rewritten D-Bus server support to directly use libdbus
to read and write D-Bus messages. The rewrite is not yet in trunk as it
hasn't been tested extensively yet. I've attached a patch to bug
560034[1].
The
Awesome, glad to hear this.
As a consequence of this, both async. and sync. operation both client and
server side will be supported then?
Do we have any other showstoppers left in dbus support then or would you
consider it feature complete?
Thanks a lot!
--
:M:
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 11:36 +0100, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
Awesome, glad to hear this.
As a consequence of this, both async. and sync. operation both client and
server side will be supported then?
Do we have any other showstoppers left in dbus support then or would you
consider
I want to write vapi bindings for a C function that gets passed another
function as argument:
public delegate void HookFunc ();
public void set_hook (HookFunc f);
But the original C function doesn't want a target argument (which Vala
passes implicitly). I can move its position with
public
Hi, Jürg!
thanks for your answers.
On 12.12.2008 14:04:51, Jürg Billeter wrote:
Hi Ildar,
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 03:03 +0600, Ildar Mulyukov wrote:
I am very new to Vala. Great thanks to Jürg and participants.
I've a question (or it's really two separate questions?)
1. What does
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 20:34 +0600, Ildar Mulyukov wrote:
On 12.12.2008 14:04:51, Jürg Billeter wrote:
Hi Ildar,
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 03:03 +0600, Ildar Mulyukov wrote:
I am very new to Vala. Great thanks to Jürg and participants.
I've a question (or it's really two separate
Frederik wrote:
I want to write vapi bindings for a C function that gets passed another
function as argument:
public delegate void HookFunc ();
public void set_hook (HookFunc f);
But the original C function doesn't want a target argument (which Vala
passes implicitly). I can move its
Hi,
Take a look:
int main (void) {
int Cvariable;
__asm__ (movl Cvariable, %eax); // Cvariable
contents eax
__asm__ (movl $Cvariable, %ebx); // ebx --- Cvariable
}
These are Assembler inline instructions, which you can use in C.
What do you
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 23:44 +0600, Ildar Mulyukov wrote:
Hi,
Take a look:
int main (void) {
int Cvariable;
__asm__ (movl Cvariable, %eax); // Cvariable
contents eax
__asm__ (movl $Cvariable, %ebx); // ebx --- Cvariable
}
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 17:46 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 23:44 +0600, Ildar Mulyukov wrote:
Hi,
Take a look:
int main (void) {
int Cvariable;
__asm__ (movl Cvariable, %eax); // Cvariable
contents eax
__asm__
Hello all!!
I want to access a xpm file from vala, i created this vapi file:
namespace MyXpms
{
[CCode (cname=my_xpm, cheader_filename=my.xpm)]
public string[] my_xpm;
}
vala generates this
#include my.xpm
but i want this
#include my.xpm
Is there a way to specify a local header file?
My
On 14.12.2008 00:00:31, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 17:46 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 23:44 +0600, Ildar Mulyukov wrote:
What do you think about having C inline in Vala? This looks quite
natural for Vala. Especially while Vala is quite unperfect (having
On 13.12.2008 23:46:50, Karl Lattimer wrote:
There would have to be some sanity wrapping though to make sure that
the C stuff would work properly with the vala stuff...
At the moment it seems almost impossible to implement and not necessary
as gcc anyway checks this staff. Or you meant
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 00:51 +0600, Ildar Mulyukov wrote:
On 14.12.2008 00:00:31, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 17:46 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 23:44 +0600, Ildar Mulyukov wrote:
What do you think about having C inline in Vala? This looks quite
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 00:55 +0100, Hans Vercammen wrote:
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 00:51 +0600, Ildar Mulyukov wrote:
On 14.12.2008 00:00:31, Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 17:46 +, Karl Lattimer wrote:
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 23:44 +0600, Ildar Mulyukov wrote:
What do you
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 22:05 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 00:55 +0100, Hans Vercammen wrote:
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 23:44 +0600, Ildar Mulyukov wrote:
[...]
1. inlining asm is most unportable. But this did not prevent from
adding it to GCC. Surely it should be
To describe a float literal use a trailing f like this:
float x = 12.34f;
Martin
Yu Feng wrote:
Greetings,
I am receiving compiler errors for this:
float a = 0.0;
Shouldn't this be converted automatically?
I use
float a = (float)0.0
as a correction.
But doesn't it look
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 05:23 +0100, Hans Vercammen wrote:
On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 22:05 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
Machines can be happy if the ccode are written carefully, but a
bilingual text is usually difficult for human beings to understand; to
me this is more convincable than any other
18 matches
Mail list logo
