I've updated the Vala support patches initially written by Mathias
Hasselmann to fix a few issues and to conform to the reworked header
file generation in Vala 0.7. It appears to work well with a simple test
project including correct distcheck and maintainer-clean functionality.
I didn't get
You are right, it's was a bug.
Today I updated my vala to 0.6.0 and it works now.
Leonti
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Yu Feng rainwood...@gmail.com wrote:
I bet it is a bug.
Yu
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 00:14 +0200, Leonti Bielski wrote:
Ok, thanks for the advise then.
Now I have
Does Vala have a typedef? If so, what's its syntax.
(Also, should this have gone to a different list?)
___
Vala-list mailing list
Vala-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
Depends on what you're typedef'ing unfortunetly.
One of the things I've noted that the Vala website currently lacks is a
Using Vala with C tutorial - based on the assumption of existing C
knowledge and that you'll be working with non-gobject libraries.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Charles
Dear Jurg,
I have two questions:
If a VALA package depends on the features provided in the patch, will
the distributed tarball(make dist) be compilable on a system with a
unpatched automake?
Is VALA itself going to make use of the features once the they are
accepted in the automake upstream? If
