On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 07:17 +0800, Yu Feng wrote:
I was trying to catch up with recent vala master branch, but I get this
error:
valacodevisitor.vala:308.34-308.37: error: The type name `Loop' could not be
found
public virtual void visit_loop (Loop stmt) {
[...]
Nevertheless git
* Arc Riley wrote, On 24/06/09 17:55:
While don't you write an example of what your proposal would look like
to the list? I honestly don't understand how your proposed solution
would work for non-gobject bindings.
Off my head, with possibly wrong syntax, possibly abuse of abstract in
Dear list(s),
I have been playing around GLib and libyaml with vala for a couple of
months. While I don't see a clear future of the code, I would like to
post a link to my code in case it will be useful to others.
The library is written in VALA, but one can write applications and link
against it
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 09:24 +0200, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 07:17 +0800, Yu Feng wrote:
I was trying to catch up with recent vala master branch, but I get this
error:
valacodevisitor.vala:308.34-308.37: error: The type name `Loop' could not
be found
public
Refer to Sam's email on Jun 24th Switch statement on GType.
I can't access mail-archive in china; weird.
---
vapi/gobject-2.0.vapi |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vapi/gobject-2.0.vapi b/vapi/gobject-2.0.vapi
index 54b53e0..d902452 100644
---
Dear list,
Here are a few small improvements on gsl bindings.
Several places the pointers are properly replaced by arrays, and several
delegates are handled the native vala way.
- Yu
--- vapi/gsl.vapi 2009-06-19 15:45:23.0 +0800
+++ ../vala/vapi/gsl.vapi 2009-06-25 07:06:59.0
2009/6/25 Yu Feng rainwood...@gmail.com
Dear list,
Here are a few small improvements on gsl bindings.
Several places the pointers are properly replaced by arrays, and several
delegates are handled the native vala way.
Thanks for the patch, hope juergbi can apply it
Matias
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:24 +0800, Yu Feng wrote:
Only for expressions. No parenthesis is added to string macros.
A test is attached. Without the patch compiles to a wrong expression.
What do you mean with ?
Jürg
___
Vala-list mailing list
Hi,
thats a common problem with C makros. Here a better example:
public const double = 1.0 + 3.0;
public const double = 2.0 / ;
will be replaced to 2.0 / 1.0 + 3.0 = 5.0 instead of 0.5.
The Patch add () around and the statement will be correct:
= 2.0 / ( 1.0 + 3.0
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 14:37 -0400, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
It's been a while since I sent this, and looking at the archives, I somehow
must have mangled the email. Here it is again. This fixes the binding for
getpgid() to take a single parameter, a pid_t, which complies both with POSIX
10 matches
Mail list logo
