Ah, another one of the anti-mono guys. Sigh...
Let me tell you, that from the sole principle of how Vala works, it
will never be possible to convert C# code in a mechanistic fashion.
You could maybe try creating some sort of automatic converter, which
wouldn't work anyway, as it would result in a
* Jiří Zárevúcky wrote, On 26/06/09 12:28:
Ah, another one of the anti-mono guys. Sigh...
Ah, another one of those guys who sees anti-mono guys everywhere.
Let me tell you, that from the sole principle of how Vala works, it
will never be possible to convert C# code in a mechanistic
Ah, ok, I'm sorry for my impulsive response. I may have implied a
thing or two from following parts:
Subject: Removal of Mono
-- What the hell?
It may be prudent to keep a weather eye open for the removal of mono on
the horizon.
-- As with the subject, this implies you want Mono removed.
Sure,
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Sam Liddicott wrote:
It may be prudent to keep a weather eye open for the removal of mono on
the horizon.
Wrong forum. This list is for users of Vala, not Mono trolls, no matter how
subtle. Go away, thanks.
--- Mike
Dne 26. červen 2009 14:41 Sam Liddicott s...@liddicott.com napsal(a):
I'm not advocating the vala be able to compile C# code
-- You're suggesting it. Otherwise you would mention that possibility at all.
I mentioned it in order to avoid that discussion (fail fail!). I wanted
to avoid the
I see that some-one is re-writing tomboy in C++ as gnote - why they
aren't using Vala is puzzling - probably they never heard of vala.
Actually, the person in question is a fervent c++ proponent who has
stated that vala is a gimmick.
--
http://homes.eff.org/~barlow/EconomyOfIdeas.html
I've trimmed my response after reading Aaron Andersen's post, who
expressed very neatly the issues at stake.
I'm clarifying on-topic as I seem to have given Michael the wrong
impression on a topic that is more politically charged than i realised.
* Michael B. Trausch wrote, On 26/06/09 16:03:
Patch that fix gtk_source_language_manager
0001-gtksourceview-2.0-Fix-gtk_source_language_manager-bi.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Vala-list mailing list
Vala-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 16:41 +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
I've trimmed my response after reading Aaron Andersen's post, who
expressed very neatly the issues at stake.
I'm clarifying on-topic as I seem to have given Michael the wrong
impression on a topic that is more politically charged than
Levi Bard wrote:
Actually, the person in question is a fervent c++ proponent who has
stated that vala is a gimmick.
Perhaps someone should port tomboy to Vala just to illustrate what the
language is capable, compared to both Mono and C++. I think anyone
considering Vala for development would
2009/6/26 Michael Torrie torr...@gmail.com:
Levi Bard wrote:
Actually, the person in question is a fervent c++ proponent who has
stated that vala is a gimmick.
Perhaps someone should port tomboy to Vala just to illustrate what the
language is capable, compared to both Mono and C++. I think
Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
Honestly, making yet another port of Tomboy is the stupidest idea I've
read on this mailing list so far. There is already a lot of original
and formidable projects that illustrate how capable Vala is. Try to be
at least a bit original and not just copy another people's
I'd rather like a possibility to automatically convert (or semi-convert,
with manual fixes) C# code to Vala. There are some C#/Mono libraries out
there (like Banshees ListView implementation) which provide a real benefit.
Right now these libraries are only available to Mono applications. In some
Hi people :
I was working on a new xml api inspirated in python ElementTree :
GIT repository :
* http://git.gnome.org/cgit/libgeexml/
Some samples :
* http://git.gnome.org/cgit/libgeexml/tree/test
Python ElementTree Api :
* http://docs.python.org/library/xml.etree.elementtree.html
I hope you
Dear Michael,
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 14:41 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
Dear Yu,
Am Freitag, den 26.06.2009, 08:52 +0800 schrieb Yu Feng:
Long time ago before the DBus is rewritten we can use
Connection.register_object in dbus-glib-1.vapi
Not sure if it is still useful
Hello again,
As you know, I've been working on the Oracle OCI bindings. Now that it's
funcational, I wanna wrap it into a more friendly, vala style interface.
I would like more of the options as properties, but I'm not sure if
there's a special way to define them. EG:
using OCI;
public class
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 21:40 -0600, Shawn Ferris wrote:
Hello again,
As you know, I've been working on the Oracle OCI bindings. Now that it's
funcational, I wanna wrap it into a more friendly, vala style interface.
I would like more of the options as properties, but I'm not sure if
there's a
Now, in the Vapi, I could do this to type args: (HType being the enum in
this case)
public int HandleFree (
void* handlp,
HType type
);
so, I'm not sure what the difference really is?
looks like you triggered a bug in valac
18 matches
Mail list logo
