I tried to contact vala developers other ways but I guess I'm filtered
out by spam filters or something like that.
I'd like to propose a sugar syntax for notifications:
object.property::notify += ...
or
object.notify::property += ...
The second syntax will work with details of signals as
Maciej Piechotka wrote:
I tried to contact vala developers other ways but I guess I'm filtered
out by spam filters or something like that.
I'd like to propose a sugar syntax for notifications:
object.property::notify += ...
or
object.notify::property += ...
The second syntax will
Add support for the complete POSIX set of functions in mman.h like
mmap(), munmap() and mprotect() and also support the MLR and XSI
extension functions.
Signed-off-by: Julian Andres Klode j...@jak-linux.org
---
vapi/posix.vapi | 36
1 files changed, 36
Frederik scumm_fr...@... writes:
The current syntax is:
object.notify[property] += ... // deprecated
or
object.notify[property].connect (...)
How is this hard?
Best regards,
Frederik
Point for you. I haven't spotted this sytntax (I bet I searched both vala
documentation
Hello,
For an application that I am working on, I need to keep a collection of
strings and possibly remove a string from the collection. A list seems
to be a good way to manage the strings but when I try to remove() or
remove_all(), the list doesn't change. for example:
public static void
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 19:03 +, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
Frederik scumm_fr...@... writes:
The current syntax is:
object.notify[property] += ... // deprecated
or
object.notify[property].connect (...)
How is this hard?
Best regards,
Frederik
Point for
2009/8/28 Jan Hudec b...@ucw.cz
Hello,
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
On Fri, August 28, 2009 09:02, Yin Jintao wrote:
You can using
