On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 09:55:36PM -0400, Michael Terry wrote:
> I notice that the release notes for 0.3.4 said support was added for
> detailed signals [1]. What's the syntax for it? Super-obvious
> attempts at using them didn't work.
>
> [1] You know, a signal like "changed::foobar"
obj.chang
Hi there,
I think I may have found a bug in valac concerning default arguments to
functions.
I'm wondering if what I am doing is wrong, or whether its allowed.
Thanks,
Sam
The following code compiles into incorrect C:
void do_something(uint8[] array1,
uint8[] array2,
I notice that the release notes for 0.3.4 said support was added for
detailed signals [1]. What's the syntax for it? Super-obvious
attempts at using them didn't work.
[1] You know, a signal like "changed::foobar"
-mt
___
vala-list mailing list
vala-li
We are pleased to announce version 0.9.1 of Vala, a compiler for the
GObject type system.
Vala 0.9.1 is now available for download at:
http://download.gnome.org/sources/vala/0.9/
Changes since 0.8.0
* Support constants in enums.
* Deprecate +=/-= syntax to connect/disconnect signal handlers.
Hi,
2010/6/4, Arc Riley :
> What is the intended syntax for something like this:
>
> blobs : list of array of uint8
>
> The best I've found so far is
> struct bytes
> value : array of uint8
> blobs : list of bytes
Vala doesn't support arrays as generics, so this isn't Genie's fault.
(if yo