On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 17:17 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
Curious:
What does rank mean?
The compiler uses the rank of integer types to determine what implicit
casts should be allowed. The larger the range on common platforms, the
higher the rank in the bindings.
Jürg
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 10:06 +0700, Hans Baier wrote:
2009/3/6 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer mic...@vanille-media.de:
Added the IntegerType descriptor. Can we apply the attached patch then?
Maybe you could consider altering glib.vapi too,
because there, Pid is defined as:
GPid is a pointer, not
are not included in the Gl.vapi. So I guess only
Clutter offers GLSL bindings for VALA coders at the moment.
Cheers
Godwin
From: j...@bitron.ch
To: hansfba...@googlemail.com
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 22:30:58 +0100
CC: Vala-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Vala] Added kill and pid_t to posix.vapi
On Fri, 2009
Curious:
What does rank mean?
Yu
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 14:15 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 13:50 +0100, pancake wrote:
mmh, pid_t is not a struct, is an 'int', in which whay do you get
the (int) value of this empty struct? I would rather prefer to do
it in another way
Added the IntegerType descriptor. Can we apply the attached patch then?
Cheers,
--
:M:
From 64dba8143862518d7979af4dacdc4258c9cdc3a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hans Baier hansfba...@googlemail.com
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 01:38:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] posix.vapi: add pid_t and kill
2009/3/6 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer mic...@vanille-media.de:
Added the IntegerType descriptor. Can we apply the attached patch then?
Maybe you could consider altering glib.vapi too,
because there, Pid is defined as:
[SimpleType]
[CCode (default_value = 0)]
public struct Pid
Am Mittwoch, den 04.03.2009, 09:14 +0100 schrieb pancake:
Where's the SIGXXX enum? and signal()?
Already in the bindings.
--
:M:
___
Vala-list mailing list
Vala-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
Hans Baier:
Another try (attached).
Works for me here.
ACK. Looks good to me.
Regards,
--
:M:
From ea2b5b8f79fe15f862d556afffab55864a1507aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hans Baier hansfba...@googlemail.com
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:17:53 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] posix.vapi: Added kill and pid_t
mmh, pid_t is not a struct, is an 'int', in which whay do you get
the (int) value of this empty struct? I would rather prefer to do
it in another way to allow vala use the 'int' nature of the pid_t type
for conversions between numbers, strings and process-id's.
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 04.03.2009, 13:50 +0100 schrieb pancake:
mmh, pid_t is not a struct, is an 'int', in which whay do you get
the (int) value of this empty struct? I would rather prefer to do
it in another way to allow vala use the 'int' nature of the pid_t type
for conversions between numbers,
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 13:50 +0100, pancake wrote:
mmh, pid_t is not a struct, is an 'int', in which whay do you get
the (int) value of this empty struct? I would rather prefer to do
it in another way to allow vala use the 'int' nature of the pid_t type
for conversions between numbers, strings
Now it doesnt depend on GLib anymore
From b68a32b73a1aecefd25809777b8e5a948c0e3c9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hans Baier hansfba...@googlemail.com
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:17:53 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] posix.vapi: Added kill and pid_t
---
vapi/posix.vapi |7 +++
1 files changed, 7
12 matches
Mail list logo
