On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 09:48 +0200, Donn Ingle wrote:
On 15 October 2013 23:30, Evan Nemerson e...@coeus-group.com wrote:
You're close. valac doesn't handle this very well because of the
anonymous structs in the C API. It wants to assign to temporary
variables even when all you're doing is
Evan, thanks for that detailed email. There's a lot to digest, so I better
get on it.
All the best,
/d
___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
Hello,
I'm sure this is my small brain and lack of experience, but I can't
get past this compile error. I will paste a complete sample below.
---
using Gee;
using Cairo;
// Compile with: valac --pkg gee-1.0 --pkg gtk+-3.0 -X -lm
cairopath.compile.bug.vala -o test
public abstract class Shape :
Sigh.. clearly you should not listen to me.. I can't even use gmail.. My
apologies if this has landed on the list a couple of times :D
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Donn Ingle donn.in...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
//Have tried Cairo.PathData[] data;
I don't know anything about Cairo, but
array.. A quick glance at the cairo vapi, and I think you really want this?:
Cairo.PathData[] data = path.data;
I feel disturbed by that ;) Not sure why.
The code I'm trying to Vala-ize is here:
http://cairographics.org/manual/cairo-Paths.html#cairo-path-data-t
(scroll down a wee bit to
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Donn Ingle donn.in...@gmail.com wrote:
array.. A quick glance at the cairo vapi, and I think you really want
this?:
Cairo.PathData[] data = path.data;
I feel disturbed by that ;) Not sure why.
The code I'm trying to Vala-ize is here:
nevermind.. I just noticed that's wrong too :D
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Shawn Ferris shawn.fer...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Donn Ingle donn.in...@gmail.com wrote:
array.. A quick glance at the cairo vapi, and I think you really want
this?:
You're close. valac doesn't handle this very well because of the
anonymous structs in the C API. It wants to assign to temporary
variables even when all you're doing is accessing fields, and since
they're structs the temporary variables aren't pointers, which will
cause the CC to complain (even
