On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 19:07 +0200, Jürg Billeter wrote:
So far, Vala doesn't use the non-null type information by default, i.e.
your application will work fine even if you don't specify the `?` type
suffix for possibly-null types. That's about to change in the upcoming
0.3.x releases.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Jürg Billeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Short example:
public void foo (Bar bar) {
// bar is expected to be non-null
// will be enforced at run-time in future Vala versions
}
public void foo (Bar? bar) {
// bar is allowed
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 16:20 -0400, Michel Salim wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Jürg Billeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Short example:
public void foo (Bar bar) {
// bar is expected to be non-null
// will be enforced at run-time in future Vala versions
Vala differentiates between non-null and possibly-null types by means of
the type suffix `?` since version 0.1.6. The advantages of
distinguishing between non-null and possibly-null types are
* Interface documentation for method parameters and return values
* Automatic generation of
