I am trying to maintain a pool based fast implementation here,
https://github.com/kamanashisroy/aroop
I like the idea of plugable profile.
--
-- Thanks
Kamanashis Roy
___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Andrea Del Signore seje...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
recently with these two commits [1], [2] support for the posix and
dova profiles was removed from the vala compiler.
Hi again,
I've made some progress on this issue and I published my code here:
Le 2012-08-09 11:52, Andrea Del Signore a écrit :
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Andrea Del Signore seje...@gmail.com
wrote:
can you elaborate a little why the transform branch should be merged
before?
What's its
Hi all,
recently with these two commits [1], [2] support for the posix and
dova profiles was removed from the vala compiler.
I fully agree with this decision, for a number of reason starting from
the fact that these profiles were incomplete and somewhat broken.
Anyway as I said I like the idea
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Andrea Del Signore seje...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
recently with these two commits [1], [2] support for the posix and
dova profiles was removed from the vala compiler.
I fully agree with this decision, for a number of reason starting from
the fact that
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Andrea Del Signore seje...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
recently with these two commits [1], [2] support for the posix and
dova profiles was removed from the vala compiler.
I fully agree
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Andrea Del Signore seje...@gmail.comwrote:
can you elaborate a little why the transform branch should be merged
before?
What's its purpose?
Anyway we are talking about experimental stuff and we shouldn't be
worried about compatibility and such, so why not
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Andrea Del Signore seje...@gmail.com
wrote:
can you elaborate a little why the transform branch should be merged
before?
What's its purpose?
Anyway we are talking about experimental
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 12:57 +0200, Andrea Del Signore wrote:
Anyway we are talking about experimental stuff and we shouldn't be
worried about compatibility and such, so why not include a simple
patch like mine and after go for the full solution?
If this is just for experimental stuff, I'm
