2009/9/3 Yu Feng rainwood...@gmail.com:
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 13:38 +0100, Phil Housley wrote:
2009/8/22 Jan Hudec b...@ucw.cz:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 22:09:21 -0400, Yu Feng wrote:
GError doesn't support error wrapping as Java does. Is GLib is purposely
avoiding it?
If not, it will
2009/8/22 Jan Hudec b...@ucw.cz:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 22:09:21 -0400, Yu Feng wrote:
GError doesn't support error wrapping as Java does. Is GLib is purposely
avoiding it?
If not, it will become a useful feature as the number of libraries that
uses GError grows, as the feature has already
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 13:38 +0100, Phil Housley wrote:
2009/8/22 Jan Hudec b...@ucw.cz:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 22:09:21 -0400, Yu Feng wrote:
GError doesn't support error wrapping as Java does. Is GLib is purposely
avoiding it?
If not, it will become a useful feature as the number of
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 22:09:21 -0400, Yu Feng wrote:
GError doesn't support error wrapping as Java does. Is GLib is purposely
avoiding it?
If not, it will become a useful feature as the number of libraries that
uses GError grows, as the feature has already been proved useful in
Java,
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 11:52:01 -0400, Yu Feng wrote:
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 09:24 +0200, Jan Hudec wrote:
[...]
Well, so the code further up the call stack is not going to look at the
inner exception anyway except to print it to the operator, right? But for
that, it's enough to embed the
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 21:03 +0200, Jan Hudec wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 11:52:01 -0400, Yu Feng wrote:
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 09:24 +0200, Jan Hudec wrote:
[...]
Well, so the code further up the call stack is not going to look at the
inner exception anyway except to print it to the
