On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 23:48 +0100, Hans Vercammen wrote:
Why do this manually? Don't you need to chain the dispose handlers
throughout the hierarchy to make it usable somehow?
As far as I understand the GObject dispose mechanism, it doesn't prevent
the cyclic references from not being cleaned
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 01:04 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 08:08 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 23:56 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
Talking about circular references, is it possible to have a
circular ref
breaker mechanism like the one in GTK for vala fundamental
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 09:24 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 01:04 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 08:08 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 23:56 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
Talking about circular references, is it possible to have a
circular ref
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 19:36 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 13:07 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 18:35 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
Right, but I'm not sure that you need to change anything in the unref
function to get dispose functionality working. Can you
Subject: Re: [Vala] use weak and var together
To: Jürg Billeter j...@bitron.ch
Cc: vala-list@gnome.org
Date: Saturday, January 10, 2009, 12:45 PM
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 19:36 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 13:07 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 18:35 +0100, Jürg
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 13:07 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 18:35 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 12:19 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 09:24 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 01:04 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 13:16 -0800, Noah Gibbs wrote:
In addition to keeping a list of pointers to the object, you'll need
to traverse them in some way to find cycles and free storage with
cycles, but not pointed to by any non-cycles. That pass should not be
done every time you break a pointer
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 01:23 +0100, Thomas Chust wrote:
Hans Vercammen wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 13:16 -0800, Noah Gibbs wrote:
[...]
Remember that an object can be part of more than one cycle, and you
have to know how many of those refs are cyclic refs, and how many
(if any) aren't
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 23:48 +0100, Hans Vercammen wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 13:07 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 18:35 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 12:19 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 09:24 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Sat,
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 21:12 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 23:48 +0100, Hans Vercammen wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 13:07 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 18:35 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 12:19 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10
Hi Jurg,
Sorry for digging such an old post but I discovered something. See the
end of the message.
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 08:08 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 23:56 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 22:11 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 14:05
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 23:56 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 22:11 +0100, Jürg Billeter wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 14:05 +, Frédéric Gaudy wrote:
I don't know if it' a bug or a feature. When I use weak and var
keywords, I obtain a error:
error: The type name `var'
Hi,
I don't know if it' a bug or a feature. When I use weak and var keywords, I
obtain a error:
error: The type name `var' could not be found
Code :
weak var thread = Thread.create( this.process_thread, true);
If I define the type, no problem.
weak Thread thread = Thread.create(
13 matches
Mail list logo
