Re: [Vala] OpenMP Support

2017-05-15 Thread Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado
Hi Adrià,

I think not only that, but also to recognize when this can be done and
where cannot. But I think that using most Glib types can be done if the
data structures are thread safe something I'm not aware of it. I suppose
it's not easy. But can be a great win to put vala at the same level of
scala and rust.

Best regards,


El 05/05/17 a las 09:41, Adrià Arrufat escribió:
> I think it's an amazing idea, that's why I already filed a bug report:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777452
>
> However, I'm no expert on OpenMP: I've only used to parallelise for
> loops using:
> # pragma omp parallel for
> I think it is not as straight forward as I thought in Vala, since for
> loops are translated to while loops in C (from what I've seen) so that
> you can declare the control loop variable inside the loop in C and
> then check the condition to break the loop.
> I guess, some work has to be done to allow this transition from Vala to C.
> I might be wrong about the statements above, but it is what I thought
> when I had a look at the generated C code for a loop.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adrià Arrufat
>
> Sent from ProtonMail <https://protonmail.ch>, encrypted email based in
> Switzerland.
>
>
>>  Original Message 
>> Subject: [Vala] OpenMP Support
>> Local Time: May 4, 2017 10:11 AM
>> UTC Time: May 4, 2017 8:11 AM
>> From: gagui...@aguilardelgado.com
>> To: vala-list@gnome.org
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Do you know what it would be great?
>>
>> Let Vala insert the correct OpenMP hints into the C compiler code when
>> it detects OpenMP should be used on target system.
>>
>> It can even generate two versions of the same code. One with OpenMP
>> support and other without it, controlled by define statements and enable
>> or disable them at build.
>>
>> It means we can take advantage of multiprocessor most of the time
>> without really adding complexity to vala code.
>>
>> Do you think is feasible?
>>
>> Other idea I was digging into is a implementation of twitter finagle in
>> vala. It would be great to start building serious things outside the
>> pure gnome environment. Servers that are really scalable and built on
>> C... It would be great. Futures, Servers, Metrics... It opens the door
>> to great things...
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>> ___
>> vala-list mailing list
>> vala-list@gnome.org
>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
>

___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list


Re: [Vala] OpenMP Support

2017-05-05 Thread Adrià Arrufat via vala-list
I think it's an amazing idea, that's why I already filed a bug report:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777452

However, I'm no expert on OpenMP: I've only used to parallelise for loops using:
# pragma omp parallel for
I think it is not as straight forward as I thought in Vala, since for loops are 
translated to while loops in C (from what I've seen) so that you can declare 
the control loop variable inside the loop in C and then check the condition to 
break the loop.
I guess, some work has to be done to allow this transition from Vala to C.
I might be wrong about the statements above, but it is what I thought when I 
had a look at the generated C code for a loop.

Regards,

Adrià Arrufat

Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.ch), encrypted email based in 
Switzerland.

 Original Message 
Subject: [Vala] OpenMP Support
Local Time: May 4, 2017 10:11 AM
UTC Time: May 4, 2017 8:11 AM
From: gagui...@aguilardelgado.com
To: vala-list@gnome.org

Hi,

Do you know what it would be great?

Let Vala insert the correct OpenMP hints into the C compiler code when
it detects OpenMP should be used on target system.

It can even generate two versions of the same code. One with OpenMP
support and other without it, controlled by define statements and enable
or disable them at build.

It means we can take advantage of multiprocessor most of the time
without really adding complexity to vala code.

Do you think is feasible?

Other idea I was digging into is a implementation of twitter finagle in
vala. It would be great to start building serious things outside the
pure gnome environment. Servers that are really scalable and built on
C... It would be great. Futures, Servers, Metrics... It opens the door
to great things...

What do you think?

Best regards,

___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list


[Vala] OpenMP Support

2017-05-04 Thread Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado
Hi,

Do you know what it would be great?

Let Vala insert the correct OpenMP hints into the C compiler code when
it detects OpenMP should be used on target system.

It can even generate two versions of the same code. One with OpenMP
support and other without it, controlled by define statements and enable
or disable them at build.

It means we can take advantage of multiprocessor most of the time
without really adding complexity to vala code.

Do you think is feasible?

Other idea I was digging into is a implementation of twitter finagle in
vala. It would be great to start building serious things outside the
pure gnome environment. Servers that are really scalable and built on
C... It would be great. Futures, Servers, Metrics... It opens the door
to great things...

What do you think?


Best regards,


___
vala-list mailing list
vala-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list