On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Brad Hards wrote:
> There is a bit of interest[0] in running a test coverage BoF session at
> linux.conf.au 2008[1] (Melbourne, Australia).
>
> Are any of the valgrind developers going to be at the conference?
I work on the Melbourne Uni campus so it would be very easy for me
Nightly build on alvis ( i686, Red Hat 7.3 ) started at 2008-01-05 03:15:04 GMT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ..
There is a bit of interest[0] in running a test coverage BoF session at
linux.conf.au 2008[1] (Melbourne, Australia).
Are any of the valgrind developers going to be at the conference?
Brad
[0] http://lists.mel8ourne.org/pipermail/chat/2008-January/thread.html#37
[1] http://linux.conf.au
--
Nightly build on lloyd ( x86_64, Fedora 7 ) started at 2008-01-05 03:05:09 GMT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ...
Nightly build on dellow ( x86_64, Fedora 8 ) started at 2008-01-05 03:10:07 GMT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ..
Nightly build on gill ( x86_64, Fedora Core 2 ) started at 2008-01-05 03:00:03
GMT
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests
On 04/01/2008, Bart Van Assche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2008 7:11 PM, Julian Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A more serious module-related question for drd is that it should not
> > include pub_core_*.h. Tools may only include pub_tool_*.h, in order
> > to control the comple
Author: tom
Date: 2008-01-05 00:12:45 + (Sat, 05 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 7318
Log:
Add drd suppression file to the default suppressions and avoid
including core headers in the drd tool.
Patch from Bart Van Assche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Modified:
trunk/configure.in
trunk/exp-drd/drd_main.
Author: tom
Date: 2008-01-05 00:01:20 + (Sat, 05 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 7317
Log:
Fix compiler warnings by using a variable to hide the null pointer
from the compiler.
Patch from Bart Van Assche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Modified:
trunk/memcheck/tests/execve.c
trunk/memcheck/tests/execve.s
Author: tom
Date: 2008-01-04 23:58:32 + (Fri, 04 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 7316
Log:
Add const qualifiers to fix compiler warnings.
Patch from Bart Van Assche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Modified:
trunk/memcheck/tests/oset_test.c
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/oset_test.c
===
Author: tom
Date: 2008-01-04 23:57:15 + (Fri, 04 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 7315
Log:
Add missing include to fix compiler warning.
Patch from Bart Van Assche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Modified:
trunk/exp-drd/drd_segment.c
Modified: trunk/exp-drd/drd_segment.c
===
Author: tom
Date: 2008-01-04 23:55:27 + (Fri, 04 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 7314
Log:
Fix compiler warning.
Patch from Bart Van Assche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Modified:
trunk/memcheck/tests/sigprocmask.c
Modified: trunk/memcheck/tests/sigprocmask.c
I had a look at the non-drd regression test that fail on all
platforms. Is the patch below a correct fix for the
memcheck/tests/pointer-trace regression test ?
Index: memcheck/tests/pointer-trace.stderr.exp
===
--- memcheck/tests/poin
Can the attached patch please be reviewed and applied ?
Thanks,
Bart.
Index: memcheck/tests/execve2.c
===
--- memcheck/tests/execve2.c (revision 7313)
+++ memcheck/tests/execve2.c (working copy)
@@ -3,7 +3,9 @@
int main ( int argc
On Jan 1, 2008 7:11 PM, Julian Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A more serious module-related question for drd is that it should not
> include pub_core_*.h. Tools may only include pub_tool_*.h, in order
> to control the complexity of the core/tool interface. For one thing
> that will require
I don't know how it is possible, but an #include directive was missing in
the patch I submitted. The attached patch fixes this. Can this patch please
be applied ?
Thanks,
Bart.
-- Forwarded message --
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 2, 2008 11:07 AM
Subject: [Valgrind-develop
Can the attached patch please be reviewed and applied ?
Thanks,
Bart.
Index: memcheck/tests/sigprocmask.c
===
--- memcheck/tests/sigprocmask.c (revision 7313)
+++ memcheck/tests/sigprocmask.c (working copy)
@@ -11,10 +11,10 @@
int
On Dec 30, 2007 1:28 PM, Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27/12/2007, Bart Van Assche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I know that not everyone uses the const keyword wherever possible, but I
> > would appreciate if the Valgrind core would support programmers that
> follow
> > this style
Author: sewardj
Date: 2008-01-04 13:09:44 + (Fri, 04 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 7313
Log:
Rename the VG_AR_SYMTAB arena to VG_AR_DINFO to reflect more
accurately its purpose.
Modified:
branches/DATASYMS/coregrind/m_debuginfo/debuginfo.c
branches/DATASYMS/coregrind/m_debuginfo/readdwarf.c
Author: sewardj
Date: 2008-01-04 11:36:41 + (Fri, 04 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 7312
Log:
Rename drd_preloaded.c to drd_intercepts.c (Bart Van Assche)
Added:
trunk/exp-drd/drd_intercepts.c
Removed:
trunk/exp-drd/drd_preloaded.c
Modified:
trunk/exp-drd/Makefile.am
trunk/exp-drd/tests/
Author: sewardj
Date: 2008-01-04 11:08:38 + (Fri, 04 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 7311
Log:
Create a copy of trunk r7310 intended to be used for improving reading
of data symbols.
Added:
branches/DATASYMS/
Copied: branches/DATASYMS (from rev 7310, trunk)
21 matches
Mail list logo
