Can Massif give an accurate value for peak memory usage, without
running very slowly?
I understand that recording a detailed snapshot is expensive, hence
the --peak-inaccuracy option. But in my case, I'm not interested in a
detailed snapshot; all I want is an accurate value for the peak memory
Thanks Bart but I'm using valgrind 3.5.0 and I don't see it
-Original Message-
From: bart.vanass...@gmail.com [mailto:bart.vanass...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Bart Van Assche
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 4:14 AM
To: Osman, Ahmed
Cc: valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re:
Hello Ahmed,
It's pretty easy to download the 3.6.1 source code from
www.valgrind.org and to compile and install it. Any software developer
should be able to do that.
Bart.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Osman, Ahmed ahmed_os...@mentor.com wrote:
Thanks Bart but I'm using valgrind 3.5.0 and
Hi,
I am using helgrind to look for deadlocks in a C++ server program.
I am running into the following problem: There are some objects that
are declared statically in the server. I am seeing stack traces for
Required order that include
__static_initialization_and_destruction_0(...) in the