Re: [Valgrind-users] Spam (7.009):Re: valgrind-3.10 does not link on

2014-10-29 Thread Florian Krohm
On 29.10.2014 12:00, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 29/10/14 10:29, Julian Seward wrote: >> On 10/29/2014 09:24 AM, Florian Krohm wrote: >>> I've fixed this in revision 14673. >>> Curious, what GCC version have you been using? >> >> I think the deciding factor might be, not the gcc version, but the CPU >>

Re: [Valgrind-users] Spam (7.009):Re: valgrind-3.10 does not link on

2014-10-29 Thread Tom Hughes
On 29/10/14 10:29, Julian Seward wrote: > On 10/29/2014 09:24 AM, Florian Krohm wrote: >> I've fixed this in revision 14673. >> Curious, what GCC version have you been using? > > I think the deciding factor might be, not the gcc version, but the CPU > variant being compiled for. In particular that

Re: [Valgrind-users] Spam (7.009):Re: valgrind-3.10 does not link on

2014-10-29 Thread Julian Seward
On 10/29/2014 09:24 AM, Florian Krohm wrote: > I've fixed this in revision 14673. > Curious, what GCC version have you been using? I think the deciding factor might be, not the gcc version, but the CPU variant being compiled for. In particular that some AMDs do or don't have special variants of t

Re: [Valgrind-users] valgrind-3.10 does not link on

2014-10-29 Thread Florian Krohm
I've fixed this in revision 14673. Curious, what GCC version have you been using? I recommend you file a bug report in the future as issues reported on the mailing list easily get forgotten. Florian On 18.09.2014 10:09, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hello, > > This is on a Linux host running: >