On 2023/06/25 2:09, mamsds wrote:
Hi John,
I am using Debian on RaspberryPi and everything is from the official
apt package manager.
Hardware architecture: armv7l GNU/Linux
OS version:Raspbian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Libmicrohttpd: stable, 0.9.72-2 armhf
Valgrind:
Still No Go.
If anyone reading this e-mail is involved in bugs.kde.org bugzilla
management, please let the "sysadmin" know there is a perplexed
developer why on earth the following is deemed a spam, and being blocked
to the bugzilla web.
Oh, yes, please also ask whoever is responsible to
On 2022/09/23 9:11, John Reiser wrote:
I think valgrind experienced a division by zero.
readdwarf.c:
if (op_code >= info.li_opcode_base) {
op_code -= info.li_opcode_base;
Word adv = (op_code / info.li_line_range) <--- line 831
*
ne 831
* info.li_min_insn_length;
Int advAddr = adv;
state_machine_regs.address += adv;
On 2022/09/22 13:39, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
Hi,
I could not post this bug report to the kde bugzilla due to the
following error message.
==
Your comment has been automatically b
Hi,
I could not post this bug report to the kde bugzilla due to the
following error message.
==
Your comment has been automatically blocked as it is believed to contain
spam. Please contact Sysadmin if you believe this to be incorrect.
==
Well, it does not, and the bugzilla
John, Paul, and Mark
Thank you for the information.
Debian is a bit slow in updating tools. It is very conservative.
Eventually, I obtained the valgrind git code.
(Debian is a bit slow in updating tools. It is very conservative.)
It contained the following.
#if defined(VGO_linux)
Hi,
I sent a log of redirect information to both Paul and John since the log
was too large was mailing list.
I wonder what would be the preferred public sharing site for such a
purpose these days.
TIA
Chiaki
On 2022/05/21 0:57, John Reiser wrote:
(Wait, I see "279:13.65 GECKO(392456)
Dear Paul,
On 2022/05/20 16:58, Floyd, Paul wrote:
Hi Chiaki
Debugging redirection issues isn't normally too slow. Redirection is
done when Valgrind loads the guest executable and libraries.
Run Valgrind with --trace-redir=yes and you should see Valgrind
printing what it finds in
*
Dear Paul,
Thank you for your e-mail and the lucid explanation.
I am sorry that I could not write to you earlier.
There was something wrong with my PC hardware and it took me quite a
while to re-install many software products I regularly use.
I will try to create a short sample. (The whole
Hi,
I have been analyzing thunderbird mail client under valgrind for sometime.
memcheck has been so useful for me to find memory-related errors.
Thank you for releasing this great tool.
Recently, I noticed an invalid read of 8 bytes warning, which should be
familiar to all of us.
Thank you for your clarification.
It certainly seems the inlined function is not handled well, come to
think of it.
I will look at the video you kindly referred to.
Thank you again.
Chiaki
On 2022/02/16 20:24, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:46:32PM +0900, ISHIKAWA,chiaki
This is tangent to the original question, but this part:
with split-dwarf (which rnglistx and strx
form codes doesn't support yet)
valgrind does support bulk of data generated by --split-dwarf (gcc),
doesn't it?
The above refers to "doesn't support" rnglistx and strx form codes?
I am
On 2017/06/16 22:55, John Reiser wrote:
On 06/16/2017 06:31 AM, Zhiming Wang wrote:
By the way, just a suggestion, maybe you could publish the
SHA-256 checksums of release tarballs instead of MD5?
Please also publish the exact length in bytes.
This is worth _more_ than expanding the width of
Hi,
Thank you again.
I will hopefully upload the requested info next week.
Here is what I can write down today.
What would be the appropriate upload service? [The data would be too
large for e-mail to the list.]
On 2017/02/19 7:32, John Reiser wrote:
> How many failures occur in 10 runs of
On 2017/02/16 1:50, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
> On 2017/02/15 23:32, Tom Hughes wrote:
>> On 15/02/17 13:34, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
>>
>>> When I tried to run mozilla thunderbird mail client, which I create
>>> under Debian GNU/Linux 64-bit,
>>> under valgr
On 2017/02/15 23:32, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 15/02/17 13:34, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
>
>> When I tried to run mozilla thunderbird mail client, which I create
>> under Debian GNU/Linux 64-bit,
>> under valgrind, valgrind mysteriously crashed and gdb was not much help.
>
&
ntion to the free vs delete issue
much.
Just my two cents worth.
CI
On 2016/01/19 7:13, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
> On 2016/01/18 23:32, Julian Seward wrote:
>> Chiaki,
>>
>>> First of all, thank you for sharing this great package.
>> First of all, thank you
On 2016/01/18 23:32, Julian Seward wrote:
> Chiaki,
>
>> First of all, thank you for sharing this great package.
> First of all, thank you for supporting Thunderbird. I use it all the time.
>
>> --11405-- WARNING: Serious error when reading debug info
>> --11405-- When reading debug info from
>>
Hi,
First of all, thank you for sharing this great package.
I encountered a strange bug (?) while trying to use valgrind to
validate the operation of a binary produced when I was testing Mozilla
Thunderbird operation.
The observation is with valgrind -3.12.0 SVN which was compiled last
Hi,
I was running mozilla TB and found a message during a test run
==20163== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==20163==at 0x90974BC: nsJSObjWrapper::NP_SetProperty(NPObject*,
void*, _NPVariant const*) (nsJSNPRuntime.cpp:137)
...
so there is an uninitialized
Sorry for a lengthy post, but
I got the following output from valgrind/memcheck while
I was testing mozilla thunderbird using its test framework, make mozmill.
By running thunderbird under memgrind while it goes through
tests, I can detect where some variables are not initialized and used, or
(2013/04/10 3:41), Julian Seward wrote:
On 04/09/2013 07:54 PM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
Sorry for a lengthy post, but
I got the following output from valgrind/memcheck while
I was testing mozilla thunderbird using its test framework, make mozmill.
Did you use --smc-check=all-non-file
My comment inline:
(2013/04/10 4:01), John Reiser wrote:
I got the following output from valgrind/memcheck while
I was testing mozilla thunderbird using its test framework, make mozmill.
1. Can this unfamiliar clone be supported?
==803== Unsupported clone() flags: 0x800600
Perhaps. Here
Hi,
You can try the patch against 3.8.1 and
it should work as expected.
Looks like this is:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307082
which contains an analysis and has an attached patch.
The output from the patch in the bug database may insert one extra line
to offend some users's
drinking egg nog. A peril of posting something in the middle of
the night when one ought to be sleeping.)
TIA
(2012/12/23 22:06), Philippe Waroquiers wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 03:36 +0900, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
Since the testing is automated (and shrouded in many layers of
test scripts
Thank you for your response.
(2012/12/23 2:58), Philippe Waroquiers wrote:
helgrind can't really know which task is being removed from the waiting list
and
so decrmenting nWaiters is all it does (I think).
I think it does a lot more (otherwise helgrind could not follow at all what
would
(2012/12/19 3:57), Philippe Waroquiers wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 21:00 +0900, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
(2012/12/18 8:07), Philippe Waroquiers wrote:
Destruction of unknown cond var is probably/maybe bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307082
I have produced a patch to take care
(2012/12/18 8:07), Philippe Waroquiers wrote:
Destruction of unknown cond var is probably/maybe bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307082
I have produced a patch to take care of the issue.
But before that, I have a question.
Q1: Why does valgrind not complain if I compile link
Marc's
28 matches
Mail list logo
