[Valgrind-users] Address 0xNNNNN is N bytes inside a block of size N alloc'd

2009-07-27 Thread Pavel Shevaev
Folks, could you please tell what exactly this error message mean? I googled around the documentation and found nothing... Thanks -- Best regards, Pavel -- ___ Valgrind-users

Re: [Valgrind-users] Address 0xNNNNN is N bytes inside a block of size N alloc'd

2009-07-27 Thread Christoph Bartoschek
Am Montag, 27. Juli 2009 schrieb Pavel Shevaev: Folks, could you please tell what exactly this error message mean? I googled around the documentation and found nothing... If the message is: Address 0xN is Y bytes inside a block of size X alloc'd Then you have somehow allocated X bytes of

Re: [Valgrind-users] Address 0xNNNNN is N bytes inside a block of size N alloc'd

2009-07-27 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Pavel Shevaevpacha.shev...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, could you please tell what exactly this error message mean? I googled around the documentation and found nothing... The text you quoted in the title of this e-mail is not an error message by itself, but a

Re: [Valgrind-users] Address 0xNNNNN is N bytes inside a block of size N alloc'd

2009-07-27 Thread Oliver Gerlich
Am Montag, den 27.07.2009, 21:24 +0400 schrieb Pavel Shevaev: On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Bart Van Asschebart.vanass...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Pavel Shevaevpacha.shev...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, could you please tell what exactly this error message mean? I

Re: [Valgrind-users] Address 0xNNNNN is N bytes inside a block of size N alloc'd

2009-07-27 Thread Pavel Shevaev
The lines following that give the backtrace for the sendmsg() call; and the message Address 0xad39096 is 86 bytes inside a block of size 32,444 alloc'd ... tells you details about the above error: - where the uninitialized memory was originally allocated (the lines following the Address