On 21/10/2021 20:45, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Paul Floyd:
Unless someone else has an Idea this is going to need some debugging
inside Valgrind.
It's probably the glibc implementation that is incorrectly executed by
valgrind. “g++ -fno-builtin” reproduces the issue with the original
sources.
* Paul Floyd:
> Unless someone else has an Idea this is going to need some debugging
> inside Valgrind.
It's probably the glibc implementation that is incorrectly executed by
valgrind. “g++ -fno-builtin” reproduces the issue with the original
sources.
_
On 20/10/2021 20:13, Paul Floyd wrote:
On 10/20/21 16:16, Paul FLOYD wrote:
Message du 20/10/21 17:14
De : "Vladislav Yaglamunov"
A : valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Copie à :
Objet : [Valgrind-users] Cubic root of zero gives wrong result with
clang 64-bit
I am usin
On 10/20/21 16:16, Paul FLOYD wrote:
Message du 20/10/21 17:14
De : "Vladislav Yaglamunov"
A : valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Copie à :
Objet : [Valgrind-users] Cubic root of zero gives wrong result with clang 64-bit
I am using Valgrind 3.17.0 and noticed a strange behavior whi
> Message du 20/10/21 17:14
> De : "Vladislav Yaglamunov"
> A : valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Copie à :
> Objet : [Valgrind-users] Cubic root of zero gives wrong result with clang
> 64-bit
>
>Hi,
>I am using Valgrind 3.17.0 and noticed a
Hi,
I am using Valgrind 3.17.0 and noticed a strange behavior while running a
code compiled with clang:
#include
#include
int main() {
long double x = std::cbrtl(0.0L);
printf("%Lf", x);
return 0;
}
This example gives complete wrong output:
clang++ cbrtl.cpp -o cbrtl && valgrind
