On 4/20/22 05:18, Yang Zhong wrote:
The AMX is the NEW feature in Intel new platform and from host, we can
find below cpu flags:
amx_bf16, amx_tile, amx_int8
The SPEC can be found in:
https://software.intel.com/content/dam/develop/external/us/en/documents/architecture-instructi
On 20/04/2022 13:41, Tom Hughes via Valgrind-users wrote:
Again until we know what "AMX features" are it's impossible to comment
in any detail.
So apparently AMX is this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Matrix_Extensions
So not only is it new instructions, it is new two dimensional
On 20/04/2022 13:18, Yang Zhong wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 09:37:17AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 20/04/2022 09:01, Yang Zhong wrote:
So, from above issue in Intel new platform, the valgrind need do some enablings
to be compatible
with on new platform? Seems valgrind tool can't identify t
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 09:37:17AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 20/04/2022 09:01, Yang Zhong wrote:
>
> >So, from above issue in Intel new platform, the valgrind need do some
> >enablings to be compatible
> >with on new platform? Seems valgrind tool can't identify the real HW
> >platform becaus
On 20/04/2022 09:01, Yang Zhong wrote:
So, from above issue in Intel new platform, the valgrind need do some enablings
to be compatible
with on new platform? Seems valgrind tool can't identify the real HW platform
because cpuid can't
read correct register value. thanks!
When running under va
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 10:50 +0900, Chang-Jae Lee wrote:
>
> The first definition of variable c is at line 11. We then suppress the
> line 11, and subsequent use of variable c(at line 12)
The above defines what to do speaking in terms of source lines,
while valgrind works at binary level.
There is
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Philippe Waroquiers <
philippe.waroqui...@skynet.be> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 16:01 +0900, Chang-Jae Lee wrote:
>
>
> Not too sure about what you mean with the above. Valgrind works
> at binary level, it does not really have a notion of "statement".
> For exam
On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 16:01 +0900, Chang-Jae Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I am a grad-student in KAIST, and I'm working on a project for
> finding bugs or errors.
> Currently I'm following a routine from the paper "Execution
> Suppression: An Automated Iterative Technique for Locating Memory
> Errors.
Hi All,
Is there are theoretical situation where a single thread could
repeatedly be trying to acquire a lock (as dictated by the user
program) or will Valgrind switch this thread out or will the Linux
system detect this and intervene successfully?
Futexes don't do system calls until there is suff
> In sum, you should get one *possible* execution, but it won't necessarily
> be one typical of truly concurrent execution. (Just because you have
> threads that are *runnable* at the same time does not mean that they
> actually run *concurrently* in a real system, unless you guarantee
> multuple
On Friday, March 23, 2012, Eliot Moss wrote:
> On 3/23/2012 9:10 AM, Hamid Reza Khaleghzadeh wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have some questions about Valgrind tool. I would be thankful if answer
> > me.
> >
> > 1- I want to know does Valgrind support Pthread and openMP programs?
> > 2- I need a tool th
On 3/23/2012 12:21 PM, Hamid Reza Khaleghzadeh wrote:
> Hi Dear Eliot,
I added valgrind-users back so that all can follow the email thread.
> Thanks for your answer. You said that "Valgrind does support multiple
> threads, but runs only one
> thread at a time."
> Suppose a two threaded applicati
On 3/23/2012 9:10 AM, Hamid Reza Khaleghzadeh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some questions about Valgrind tool. I would be thankful if answer me.
>
> 1- I want to know does Valgrind support Pthread and openMP programs?
> 2- I need a tool that traces my multi-threaded program and creates
> memory trace of
13 matches
Mail list logo
