Re: [Valgrind-users] --num-callers limit of 50 is not enough

2012-06-20 Thread Philippe Waroquiers
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 16:09 -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: Hi, I'm using valgrind with a C++ program that embeds python. The stack trace is pretty deep, greater than 50 at almost every point valgrind finds a memory leak. Unfortunately, I can't see the stack frame that started this chain

Re: [Valgrind-users] Bug in Valgrind 3.7.0

2012-06-20 Thread John Reiser
vex and64-IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0xDA 0xE9 0xDF 0xE0 I checked and this turns out to be a fragment in the __ieee754_powl() routine executing these two instructions: fucompp fnstsw I checked Bugzilla, it doesn't seem listed in the bugs database already. Thank you

Re: [Valgrind-users] Bug in Valgrind 3.7.0

2012-06-20 Thread John Reiser
vex and64-IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0xDA 0xE9 0xDF 0xE0 valgrind: Unrecognized instruction at address: 0x3411235BF4. Illegal opcode at address 0x3411235BF4: at 0x3411235BF4: __ieee754_powl (in /lib64/libm-2.5.so) I checked and this turns out to be a fragment in the