Hello,
The following message appears in Valgrind's output:
Thread 5 return signal frame corrupted. Killing process.
What exactly does this message mean? It looks like the thread attempted to
dereference a NULL pointer immediately before the message was printed, so
I'm guessing that the message
Hi all,
I've read where Windows programs can be run under Valgrind with some effort
with Wine. What is involved in doing this?
Thanks for your input.
Don Rosengrant
Software Engineer
[cid:image001.jpg@01CDA23C.EDD3CA70]http://www.westbrooktech.com/
Developers of Fortis(tm) and FortisBlue(tm)
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Don Rosengrant
drosengr...@westbrooktech.com wrote:
I’ve read where Windows programs can be run under Valgrind with some effort
with Wine. What is involved in doing this?
Have you seen http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine_and_Valgrind ?
- Dan
On 04/10/12 19:19, Kerrick Staley wrote:
I'm running Valgrind on Mono as it executes a C# program. The C# program
in question invokes several native routines in several different shared
object files, and it's crashing in one of these native routines. The
following is a snippet from Valgrind's
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 13:19 -0500, Kerrick Staley wrote:
I can't track down the error since the stack trace doesn't indicate
which shared object and function it occurs in.
According to http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/faq.html#faq.unhelpful,
if a shared object is unloaded before the program
Thread 5 return signal frame corrupted. Killing process.
Upon return from a signal handler, then valgrind checks the information
which the Linux kernel will use to restore the pre-signal state of the thread.
valgrind detected that the information was corrupt.
The signal handler (or some other
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 11:34 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Don Rosengrant
drosengr...@westbrooktech.com wrote:
I’ve read where Windows programs can be run under Valgrind with some effort
with Wine. What is involved in doing this?
Otherwise, if you are courageous
Hi, I am on redhat 5.8:
uname -a
Linux torstephane-lx.algorithmics.com 2.6.18-308.el5 #1 SMP Fri Jan 27 17:17:51
EST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
After running configure, I get the following output
Maximum build arch: amd64
Primary build arch: amd64
Secondary
On 10/04/2012 06:12 PM, Stephane Aubry wrote:
Hi, I am on redhat 5.8:
uname -a
Linux torstephane-lx.algorithmics.com 2.6.18-308.el5 #1 SMP Fri Jan 27
17:17:51
EST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
After running configure, I get the following output
Maximum build arch:
