On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 07:09 -0800, Greg Czajkowski wrote:
> If this assertion is not tied to any possible damage it may cause, can > it be removed or perhaps turned into a warning? A warning is similar to other similar things in Valgrind. E.g. a warning is produced when the permission of a large address range is changed. > > BTW. After removing the assertion, the process runs much further, but > eventually (after a day) valgrind hangs somewhere and stops consuming > the CPU. First time ever I have seen such behaviour, at the same time > our processes have always stretched valgrind. You might use gdb+vgdb to connect to Valgrind and examine what is the state of your process and of the Valgrind scheduler. Philippe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list Valgrind-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users
