Re: [Valgrind-users] Feature request - backtrace on warning set address range perms

2013-04-04 Thread Philippe Waroquiers
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 22:52 +0100, Philippe Waroquiers wrote: The best would be to file a bug in bugzilla, for the false negative caused by code such as: { size_t undef; char *p = malloc (undef); } Too late to file a bug in bugzilla :). An improvement has been

Re: [Valgrind-users] Feature request - backtrace on warning set address range perms

2013-04-04 Thread Jonatan Wallmander
\o/ With kind regards / Med vänliga hälsningar Jonatan Wallmander Vovoid Media Technologies AB On 04/04/2013 11:13 PM, Philippe Waroquiers wrote: On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 22:52 +0100, Philippe Waroquiers wrote: The best would be to file a bug in bugzilla, for the false negative caused by code

[Valgrind-users] Feature request - backtrace on warning set address range perms

2013-03-26 Thread Jonatan Wallmander
Feature-request: Add backtrace to output for these warnings: Warning: set address range perms: large range [0x4c339040, 0x206094130) (undefined) Explanation: This was a large allocation which ate up all my memory when debugging with valgrind making it hard for me to find where it

Re: [Valgrind-users] Feature request - backtrace on warning set address range perms

2013-03-26 Thread Philippe Waroquiers
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 14:30 +0100, Jonatan Wallmander wrote: Feature-request: Add backtrace to output for these warnings: Warning: set address range perms: large range [0x4c339040, 0x206094130) (undefined) Probably not difficult to implement, however, see below ...