UFoo; ?? Was: notes from Valhalla meeting 5/24/17

The need for a UFoo; is not clear to me. So correct me if i'm wrong, u-bytecodes are bytecodes for representing something similar to T and Foo in Java but for the VM with the supplementary constraint that T can be either a primitive, a value type or class. I do not see how does UFoo; fit in

Re: What's in a CONSTANT_Class?

You're not alone :) I want the result of an async procedure call to be a CompletableFuture too. Rémi On June 9, 2017 10:53:14 PM GMT+02:00, John Rose wrote: >On Jun 9, 2017, at 1:45 PM, John Rose wrote: >> >> Allowing in return position to