Re: notes from Valhalla meeting 5/24/17

On Jun 21, 2017, at 4:44 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: > > A BSM called to resolve a constant can choose when pulling it’s static args > to catch and swallow linkage exceptions, keep on trucking, and return a > value. Should this be allowed? Absolutely. The BSM might have an

Re: notes from Valhalla meeting 5/24/17

Thanks; all fixed. On Jun 21, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: > > > "This allows the bootstrap logic the ability to order the resolution of > constants and catch linkage exceptions.” > > And possibly still link a constant rather than re-throwing a linkage >

Re: notes from Valhalla meeting 5/24/17

> On 21 Jun 2017, at 12:37, fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote: > > > > De: "John Rose" > À: "Rémi Forax" > Cc: "Valhalla Expert Group Observers" > , > valhalla-spec-experts@openjdk.java.net > Envoyé: Mercredi 21

Re: notes from Valhalla meeting 5/24/17

> De: "John Rose" > À: "Rémi Forax" > Cc: "Valhalla Expert Group Observers" > , > valhalla-spec-experts@openjdk.java.net > Envoyé: Mercredi 21 Juin 2017 18:03:49 > Objet: Re: notes from Valhalla meeting 5/24/17

Re: notes from Valhalla meeting 5/24/17

On Jun 21, 2017, at 8:46 AM, Remi Forax wrote: > > but i do not like with this proposal as is, i will explain why and how to fix > it: > - condy is linked to a static final field but unlike invokedynamic which is a > link from an invokedynamic instruction to a

Re: minutes Valhalla EG June 07, 2017

On Jun 21, 2017, at 8:56 AM, Remi Forax wrote: > > John, > Do we agree that this API can also replace the constant pool patching done by > unsafe.defineAnonymousClass, > i.e. that the Object can be any live Object? This seems close to possible, although I would imagine that

Re: minutes Valhalla EG June 07, 2017

John, Do we agree that this API can also replace the constant pool patching done by unsafe.defineAnonymousClass, i.e. that the Object can be any live Object? Rémi > De: "John Rose" > À: "Daniel Heidinga" > Cc:

Re: minutes Valhalla EG June 07, 2017

On Jun 21, 2017, at 6:55 AM, Daniel Heidinga wrote: > > > AI: John - send out javadoc to EG > > derived class := Class.derivedClassFactory(Class mainClass, T userData, > > String name) > > In the spirit of the usual "5 min before the meeting" ritual action item >

Re: notes from Valhalla meeting 5/24/17

Nice work John, but i do not like with this proposal as is, i will explain why and how to fix it: - condy is linked to a static final field but unlike invokedynamic which is a link from an invokedynamic instruction to a CONSTANT_InvokeDynamic_info, there is no link from the static final field

Re: Meeting today ?

https://oracle.zoom.us/j/251372518 > On Jun 21, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Remi Forax wrote: > > Hi all, > does somebody can send me the correct URL for the meeting today ? > > cheers, > Rémi

Meeting today ?

Hi all, does somebody can send me the correct URL for the meeting today ? cheers, Rémi

Re: minutes Valhalla EG June 07, 2017

Dan - I can’t find it either. We’ll have to ask John. thanks, Karen > On Jun 21, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Daniel Heidinga > wrote: > > > AI: John - send out javadoc to EG > > derived class := Class.derivedClassFactory(Class mainClass, T userData, > > String name) >

Re: notes from Valhalla meeting 5/24/17

On Jun 19, 2017, at 6:28 PM, John Rose wrote: > > I have updated the javadoc portion of the spec for constant-dynamic. > There are small but strategic changes to MethodType and MethodHandle, > as well as new classes to represent the "pull mode" of constant resolution. >