Re: Final CONSTANT_Dynamic spec

> On Feb 12, 2018, at 10:05 PM, Daniel Heidinga > wrote: > > > That said, what side-effects are you concerned about? My claim is that > > re-resolution in this scenario would not, for example, trigger any class > > loading or bootstrap invocations. > > The

Re: API Updates: 8191116: [Nestmates] Update core reflection, MethodHandle and varhandle APIs to allow for nestmate access

> On Feb 12, 2018, at 6:51 PM, David Holmes wrote: >>> But I, for one, prefer a "user pays" scheme over an "everyone pays" scheme >>> (which is what disallowing duplicates would also be). >> It’s an awkward situation, experience suggests this type of thing bites back