Re: for review: 8236522: "always atomic" modifier for inline classes to enforce atomicity

2020-03-07 Thread John Rose
On Mar 7, 2020, at 2:22 PM, fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote: > > Marker interface are usually problematic because: > - they can inherited, for inline classes, you can put them on our new kind of > abstract class, which will make things just harder to diagnose. As always the flexibility of inheritance

Re: for review: 8236522: "always atomic" modifier for inline classes to enforce atomicity

2020-03-07 Thread forax
- Mail original - > De: "John Rose" > À: "Remi Forax" > Cc: "valhalla-spec-experts" > Envoyé: Samedi 7 Mars 2020 22:52:12 > Objet: Re: for review: 8236522: "always atomic" modifier for inline classes > to enforce atomicity > On Mar 7, 2020, at 1:41 PM, Remi Forax wrote: >> >>

Re: for review: 8236522: "always atomic" modifier for inline classes to enforce atomicity

2020-03-07 Thread John Rose
On Mar 7, 2020, at 1:41 PM, Remi Forax wrote: > > [Moving to valhalla-spec-experts] > > - Mail original - >> De: "John Rose" >> À: "Tobias Hartmann" >> Cc: "valhalla-dev" >> Envoyé: Vendredi 21 Février 2020 11:23:14 >> Objet: Re: for review: 8236522: "always atomic" modifier for

Re: for review: 8236522: "always atomic" modifier for inline classes to enforce atomicity

2020-03-07 Thread Remi Forax
[Moving to valhalla-spec-experts] - Mail original - > De: "John Rose" > À: "Tobias Hartmann" > Cc: "valhalla-dev" > Envoyé: Vendredi 21 Février 2020 11:23:14 > Objet: Re: for review: 8236522: "always atomic" modifier for inline classes > to enforce atomicity > I’ve come back around