- Mail original -
> De: "Brian Goetz"
> À: "Remi Forax" , "valhalla-spec-experts"
>
> Envoyé: Dimanche 9 Mai 2021 17:04:31
> Objet: Re: Make new Object() backward compatible
>> The logical conclusion is that java.lang.Object is a parametric class with a
>> parameter saying if it should
The logical conclusion is that java.lang.Object is a parametric class with a
parameter saying if it should implement IdentityObject or not.
Magic hammer, meet nail :)
To be explicit, what you're suggesting is something like
class Object { ... }
where an identity class extends Object
I think there is a way to avoid all the issues we have with new Object().
The problem:
We want to inject the interface IdentityObject on all classes that are
neither a "no field" abstract class nor a primtive class.
But java.lang.Object acts as a "no field" abstract class but it's not an
