Re: Draft of spec for Minimal Value Types

Dan, Thank you for the responses. Summary - we are good with the current JVMS description of decoupling VCC and DVC initialization and linking as long as you add vbox to require initialization of the VCC. > On Jun 13, 2017, at 6:51 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > >> On Jun

Re: Draft of spec for Minimal Value Types

> On Jun 13, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Karen Kinnear wrote: > > I wanted to follow up specifically on the load/link/init relationships for > the Value Capable Class (VCC) and the derived Value Class (DVC) to use the > terms in this JVMS draft. (Note: direct value class is the

Draft of spec for Minimal Value Types

Please see the following for a set of changes to JVMS to support our value types prototyping efforts. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dlsmith/values.html The intent is to reference this document in an umbrella JSR as a set of features that may be optionally implemented by a JVM without any