t;
> To: Bjorn B Vardal <bjorn...@ca.ibm.com>
> Cc: valhalla-spec-experts@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: MVT change in new opcode numbers?
> Date: Thu, Jul 27, 2017 3:10 PM
>
> Sigh - it does matter to us where it starts - we do quickening internally
> using the higher rang
Yes, we should be able to work with the lower range.
- Original message -From: Karen Kinnear <karen.kinn...@oracle.com>To: Bjorn B Vardal <bjorn...@ca.ibm.com>Cc: valhalla-spec-experts@openjdk.java.netSubject: Re: MVT change in new opcode numbers?Date: Thu, Jul 27, 2017
we'll be able to work with 203-211.
>
> - Original message -
> From: Karen Kinnear <karen.kinn...@oracle.com>
> Sent by: "valhalla-spec-experts"
> <valhalla-spec-experts-boun...@openjdk.java.net>
> To: valhalla-spec-experts@openjdk.java.net
> Cc:
ot;valhalla-spec-experts" <valhalla-spec-experts-boun...@openjdk.java.net>To: valhalla-spec-experts@openjdk.java.netCc:Subject: MVT change in new opcode numbers?Date: Thu, Jul 27, 2017 1:38 PM Dan Smith, Bjorn, Dan H, Remi -
Does it work for you if we change the JVMS to use the fol
