- Mail original -
> De: "daniel smith"
> À: "Remi Forax"
> Cc: "valhalla-spec-experts"
> Envoyé: Mercredi 2 Décembre 2020 16:35:06
> Objet: Re: Using a Condy instead of a Constant_Utf8
>> On Dec 2, 2020, at 3:53 AM, Remi Forax wrote:
On Dec 2, 2020, at 2:53 AM, Remi Forax wrote:
>
> There is one case where i dynamically patch a method descriptor so I can
> select how many arguments will be sent to a closure,
> i.e. in the bytecode i put all arguments on the stack but because i've
> patched the callee descriptor, only some
> On Dec 2, 2020, at 3:53 AM, Remi Forax wrote:
>
> Using a condy that returns a String instead of a method descriptor in the
> bytecode ?
> I'm currently trying to remove the uses of Unsafe.defineAnonymousClass to use
> Lookup.defineHiddenClass instead.
> There is one case where i dynamically
Using a condy that returns a String instead of a method descriptor in the
bytecode ?
I'm currently trying to remove the uses of Unsafe.defineAnonymousClass to use
Lookup.defineHiddenClass instead.
There is one case where i dynamically patch a method descriptor so I can select
how many arguments
