Re: Valhalla Minimal Value Types review invitation

2017-05-10 Thread Remi Forax
Sorry, I was thinking to be able to join the discussion during the connection in between two flights but the first one was delayed. Reading the new version of shady in the plane, i still do not see why a Qtype is needed, it seen that the VM can infer if a Qtype or a Ltype should be used. RĂ©mi

Re: Valhalla Minimal Value Types review invitation

2017-05-10 Thread John Rose
(Note to Oracle people: This is a duplicate of my message on an internal list!) I have rolled most of the effect of these comments into the Shady doc also. (Below I say that vunbox doesn't belong on the same list with vdefault, but I changed the presentation again in the Shady doc, of vunbox.

Re: Valhalla Minimal Value Types review invitation

2017-04-11 Thread Karen Kinnear
Summary of requested modifications from early prototyping experiments. Followed by action items. Terms used below: VCC for Value Capable Class annotated for creating a DVT: Derived Value This is to distinguish from the longer-term VVT, or Valhalla Value Type that will be supported by javac and