Re: nestmates JVMTI spec proposal changes

2017-12-20 Thread Remi Forax
a-spec-experts@openjdk.java.net> > Envoyé: Mercredi 20 Décembre 2017 16:58:03 > Objet: Re: nestmates JVMTI spec proposal changes > We're on board with this proposal. Any change to the NestMembers, adding or > removing members, should fail redefinition. As should changes to NestHost.

Re: nestmates JVMTI spec proposal changes

2017-12-20 Thread Daniel Heidinga
We're on board with this proposal.  Any change to the NestMembers, adding or removing members, should fail redefinition.  As should changes to NestHost.   Taking this approach now eases the implementation costs and allows us to re-examine this in the future.     --Dan   - Original message

nestmates JVMTI spec proposal changes

2017-12-19 Thread Karen Kinnear
I believe we are all in agreement that: 1. Redefinition should NOT be allowed to change the NestHost attribute and 2. Redefinition should NOT be allowed to remove NestMembers (equivalent to reducing access controls) The question was - should we allow Redefinition to add NestMembers or not?