Re: off-list Re: Valhalla EG minutes 6/21/17

2017-07-11 Thread John Rose
On Jul 11, 2017, at 4:34 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: > > That leaves the more general nested named class support which requires more > fundamental hotspot work. > > So in terms of progress order it could be: 2), 3), 1). But if we throw > isolated methods into the mix then the plot thickens. I thin

Re: off-list Re: Valhalla EG minutes 6/21/17

2017-07-11 Thread John Rose
On Jul 11, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: > > Sigh, email fail, looks like i just have :-) Well played, sir!

Re: off-list Re: Valhalla EG minutes 6/21/17

2017-07-11 Thread Paul Sandoz
> On 11 Jul 2017, at 16:34, Paul Sandoz wrote: > > Hi, > > Off-list as i am not sure i wanna commit to this publicly :-) > Sigh, email fail, looks like i just have :-) Paul. > In the interest of moving this forward independent of MVT i can prototype > some of this if you like and use the

off-list Re: Valhalla EG minutes 6/21/17

2017-07-11 Thread Paul Sandoz
Hi, Off-list as i am not sure i wanna commit to this publicly :-) In the interest of moving this forward independent of MVT i can prototype some of this if you like and use the three usages of U.DAC in the JDK as use-cases (see also [1]) Perhaps surprisingly grepcode.com reports no external usa