In message <4aded57c.3020...@upfrontsystems.co.za>, Izak Burger writes: >Hello again, > >I've discussed this issue on zope-dev. The agreement seems to be that >there is some ambiguity in the HTTP1.1 specification, but that the >general accepted interpretation is that if the other end closes the >connection you should close your end as well (it signals a timeout). > >There is also no browser implementation out there that does half-closing >(except where SSL is involved). None that I know of anyway.
I wasn't quite sure which way to interpret the text originally so I did it the way that was most convenient for the code. I'll change it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list varnish-dev@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
