-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
--
Guillaume Quintard
___
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
Indeed, I was a bit careless with that accumulate function. Let me fix
that and offer a patches additional series.
--
Guillaume Quintard
___
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo
in a few days1
--
Guillaume Quintard
___
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
friends at the hotel so we can go there
together if they wish so.
--
Guillaume Quintard
___
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
reject it, as it hasn't been touched for a while, didn't
attract any attention, and after all, autotools work well enough.
--
Guillaume Quintard
___
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo
Of course. I'll keep a github branch rebased on master to track
changes happening in the meantime.
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>
> In message
> <CAJ6ZYQzA5+wXRr0Vn9p2BOaVt=9e0ra8prre3chtz0uj3vz
, but we'd lose bmake
compatibility), and I'm all for that.
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>
> In message
> <cababnj48u7gs7f7ufy5kzfogvnk2jpp3ob7m2hgv2xiqnkj...@mail.gmail.com>
>
re-adding the list in cc.
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Guillaume Quintard <
guilla...@varnish-software.com> wrote:
> Sure, here you go. Please note I haven't integrated new changes since I
> first posted (was waiting for the 4.1 release)
>
> --
&g
definitely be useful to test varnishtest
itself.
Some things are definitely not sorted out (eg. headers compression) and of
course, opinions are welcomed.
--
Guillaume Quintard
___
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
https
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Federico Schwindt <fg...@lodoss.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the 304 case we were already skipping it for non-zero C-L.
> For 204 responses this was introduced as a side effect of 271e1c52.
>
> Comments? OK?
>
Looks OK to
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Guillaume Quintard <
guilla...@varnish-software.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> One step toward H2/ in varnish is having a way to test it. So, here's a
> draft proposal for the H/2 handling in varnishtest:
>
> http
use case.
I vote against the comment changes, we would unnecessarily break VCL for
very little gain.
--
Guillaume Quintard
___
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
Sure, old habits die hard.
On Jun 27, 2016 01:47, "Poul-Henning Kamp" <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>
> In message <
> caj6zyqyjucsnnal6j0nygcnebvq9vaccwdk8c2ojyse6awl...@mail.gmail.com>
> , Guillaume Quintard writes:
>
> >I re-read some
.
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Guillaume Quintard <
guilla...@varnish-software.com> wrote:
>
>
> --
> Guillaume Quintard
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Guillaume Quintard <
> guilla...@varnish-software.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>
t (again, I'm not judging, really asking).
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Federico Schwindt <fg...@lodoss.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm all for the LUT idea and I think it makes even more sense when you
> consider H/2.
>
> Having the same timestamp during
On Apr 6, 2016 17:14, "Dridi Boukelmoune" wrote:
> As the VIP says, no matter how pipe turns out in v5, but how does H2
> deal with protocol upgrades? I think it doesn't (eg. websockets)
>
It doesn't. If you came through ALPN, you could have gone directly to the
required
Looks ok to me. I'd just like we actually send some bytes instead of
expecting to read 0 bytes in a buf[32].
I'm not sure we actually need 2 types of barriers, but I get the need to
reduce waste when not needed.
Rebase and go?
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Dridi
Since I smelled a consensus, here are the patches to remove the
"--enable-tests"
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Guillaume Quintard <
guilla...@varnish-software.com> wrote:
> Can we get rid of the "if ENABLE_TESTS"? Tests should be execute
Can we get rid of the "if ENABLE_TESTS"? Tests should be executed. If you
don't want to run them, don't run "make check".
--
Guillaume Quintard
___
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cac
to a stream in H2?
I asked the question on IRC, and the headers compression popped up. But
actually, the headers we care about will be in about will be in HEADERS
frames. So, in case of H/2, piping would be more akin to passing with
header parsing.
--
Guillaume Quintard
I'm in favor but the potential issue lies with layered setups where objects
could be cached for too long (got bit by that one), to the conservative
approach makes sense.
We can probably just put that in a vmod and see how people like it? That'd
be a first step towards a vmod-rfc2616.
--
And I just noticed, please use varnish-misc for this kind of requests,
varnish-dev is for dev topics only.
On Jan 6, 2017 09:14, "Guillaume Quintard" <guilla...@varnish-software.com>
wrote:
> Not to beat my own drum, but I blogged about this recently: https://info.
> var
Not to beat my own drum, but I blogged about this recently:
https://info.varnish-software.com/blog/rewriting-urls-with-varnish-redirection
TL;DR: you need a 30X return code, and to put the new URL in the correct
header (location).
On Jan 6, 2017 02:06, "Kari Cowan" wrote:
> I’m
with a different
string, and then everything goes to hell. Could anyone familiar with
PRIV_CALL confirm?
Cheers,
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Stephen J. Butler <stephen.but...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> I'm a new developer/user for Varnish, and was looking to extend
g in-flight requests. Is it worth it?
I'd argue "deleted" should be "dead", just to complete the medically
depressing vocabulary list you started :-)
(and we'll need to bring back "saint" from the dead)
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nils Goroll
Yp, that's on my plate. Which is rather large...
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Thu, May 3, 2018, 13:04 Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>
> In message <CAJ6ZYQx3vsFtWeTHpoU+ifgKjPDQv3=sH=
> c5q-zxfqjcu0k...@mail.gmail.com>
> , Guillaume Quintard w
All commands should have a JSON option, I reckon.
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Thu, May 3, 2018, 12:52 Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>
> In message <1401d370-56dd-6006-2b3d-21771650f...@uplex.de>, Geoff Simmons
> write
> s:
>
> >&
Hi,
can you share your vcl?
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 1:56 AM, zart zurt wrote:
> Hi, I recently adopted some varnish servers and upgraded them to varnish
> 5.0.0 in debian-9 from the debian repositories.
>
> Most metrics are good except the backend_req value
Hi,
I open that one just to work on it with Dridi being able to look on it as I
progress. but I can move it back to my repo before opening the PR if you
prefer.
Let me know
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 8:25 AM Nils Goroll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> should we really sta
can retire the circleci experiment
--
Guillaume Quintard
___
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020, 08:46 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> In message <
> caj6zyqyw+ludthyond1ifirdn9-e0b_xdjhprjnmhkba0zx...@mail.gmail.com>
> , Guillaume Quintard writes:
>
> >Offering arm64 packages requires a few things:
>
> Don't we have packages for
is that script running as root?
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 2:30 AM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've moved 'dist' job to be executed in parallel with 'tar_pkg_tools' and
> the results from both are shared in the workspace for the actual packing
> jobs
as to
have it cloned once in tar-pkg-tools for consistency and reproducibility,
which we lose here.
- do we want to change things for the amd64 platforms for the sake of
consistency?
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 6:25 AM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Wed, M
t; martin.grigo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Guillaume,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 8:01 PM Guillaume Quintard <
>> guilla...@varnish-software.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Martin,
>>>
>>> Thank you for that.
>>> A few remarks and
/4f9d8bed6b24bf9ee900c754f37615fdba1c44db/.circleci/config.yml#L168
is
closer to what you want, `distcheck` will be call on all platform, and you
can see that it has the `--with-unwind` argument.
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 3:05 PM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020, 17:19 Guillaume
Hi,
If someone wants a leg up:
https://docs.varnish-software.com/tutorials/hit-miss-logging/
What's the goal here though? Just to provide a VCL snippet following the
spec?
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 2:07 AM Poul-Henning Kamp
wrote:
> Anybody got time for some VCL hack
I stand corrected, good to see it's not an issue.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 02:17 Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi Guillaume,
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:47 PM Guillaume Quintard <
> guilla...@varnish-software.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Varnish gives aroun
ish
instance, so that possibly explain some of the differences you are seeing.
Cheers,
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:33 AM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've updated the data in the article -
> https://medium.com/@martin.grigorov/compare-varnish-cache-perfor
Thank you Emilio, I'll contact packagecloud.io to see what's what.
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:01 AM Emilio Fernandes <
emilio.fernande...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hola Guillaume,
>
> Thank you for uploading the new packages!
>
> I've just tested Ubuntu 20.
Ola,
Pål just pushed Monday's batch, so you get amd64 and aarch64 packages for
all the platforms. Go forth and test, the paint is still very wet.
Bonne journée!
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 5:28 AM Emilio Fernandes <
emilio.fernande...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
&g
d!
Cheers,
--
Guillaume Quintard
___
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
Small follow-up on that one: it would be nice for VFP to be able to disable
streaming (bo->do_stream), so that's an extra argument to be able to access
the busyobj
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 6:11 PM Guillaume Quintard <
guillaume.quint...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ha
github.com/gquintard/vmod_rers/blob/v0.0.2/vmod.vcc#L47
[5]: https://github.com/gquintard/vmod_rers/blob/v0.0.2/src/lib.rs#L221
--
Guillaume Quintard
___
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailma
sweet
Cheers!
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 7:58 AM Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 11:48 PM Guillaume Quintard
> wrote:
> >
> > Small follow-up on that one: it would be nice for VFP to be able to
> disable streaming (bo->do_stream), so
quot;
You can also try install-vmod
<https://github.com/varnish/toolbox/tree/master/install-vmod> like we do in
the docker image:
https://github.com/varnish/docker-varnish/blob/master/fresh/debian/Dockerfile#L51
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 1:32 PM Kari Cowan wr
Please use the varnish-misc for that kind of questions (I know it failed
previously, let's try again)
you want `std.random()`, not `std.rand()`:
https://varnish-cache.org/docs/trunk/reference/vmod_std.html#std-random
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:14 AM Kari Cowan wrote
centos should be close enough
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:06 AM Kari Cowan wrote:
> is there one for redhat?
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 9:47 AM Guillaume Quintard <
> guillaume.quint...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kari,
>>
>>
47 matches
Mail list logo