Hi!
I've heard good things about varnish as a reverse proxy.
What I'd like to know is whether it is a good idea to use varnish as a
http failover, but I can't seem to find any documentation to determine
whether this is best practise or even possible.
Is varnish a good thing to use as a http/fail
On Sep 24, 2007, at 12:18 PM, jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
>
> bonjour,
>>>
>>>
>>> And i know that varnish is the best solution to cache
>>> How integrated varnish in this achitecture ? (What port must listen
>>> varnish in my architecture? How specify to apache to cache with
>>> varnish? ...)
>>
bonjour,
>>
>>
>> And i know that varnish is the best solution to cache
>> How integrated varnish in this achitecture ? (What port must listen
>> varnish in my architecture? How specify to apache to cache with
>> varnish? ...)
>>
>>
put varnish in front of apache
apache don't have to cach
On Sep 24, 2007, at 8:57 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My configuration :
> I've a apache server with the mod proxy activated listening in the
> port 80 and redirect to 9080 where my plone site listen.
>
> And i know that varnish is the best solution to cache
> How integrated varnish
Hi,
My configuration :
I've a apache server with the mod proxy activated listening in the port 80 and
redirect to 9080 where my plone site listen.
And i know that varnish is the best solution to cache
How integrated varnish in this achitecture ? (What port must listen varnish in
my architecture
Hello All,
I'm designing a sort of distributed file system used for file serving and
have been looking at multiple methods of reverse proxy caching static
content and I have to say Varnish looks like a really great product.
I have some questions as to how I can incorporate Varnish into my setup i
