Thanks Poul.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <75cf5800901212121k6647747bg31877e8b1d512...@mail.gmail.com>, Paras
> Fadte writes:
>
>>should it have "else" so that it becomes
>>
>>sub vcl_recv {
>>
>> if (req.request == "PURGE") {
>>if (
In message <75cf5800901212121k6647747bg31877e8b1d512...@mail.gmail.com>, Paras
Fadte writes:
>should it have "else" so that it becomes
>
>sub vcl_recv {
>
> if (req.request == "PURGE") {
>if (!client.ip ~ purge) {
>error 405 "Not allowed.";
>
Hi Poul,
For applying HTTP purge the VCL code specified on
http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/wiki/VCLExamplePurging shows as
following:
sub vcl_recv {
if (req.request == "PURGE") {
if (!client.ip ~ purge) {
error 405 "Not allowed.";
On Jan 21, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Charlie Farinella wrote:
> I have one site running Plone with lighttpd and Varnish that I set
> up as
> documented here:
> http://bitubique.com/content/accelerate-plone-varnish
IMHO, the vcl generated by the plone.recipe.varnish recipe is superior
to the one on
Dual-core AMD processor using the x86_64 kernel. Uname shows:
Linux 2.6.21.5 #9 SMP Thu Aug 16 17:21:29 UTC 2007 x86_64 AMD
Opteron(tm) Processor 248 AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
On Jan 21, 2009, at 2:01 PM, Iliya Sharov wrote:
> amd64 or i386 architecture?
>
> Tim Kientzle пишет:
>> We're evaluati
In message <6545783f-b1a7-4fda-94d8-8439a2d13...@metaweb.com>, Tim Kientzle wri
tes:
>Under heavy load, we're seeing a lot of segfaults and
>assertion failures. I've pasted an excerpt below of
>two of the issues we've seen using Varnish 2.0.2 on Linux
>2.6.21 kernel with the default VCL (using co
amd64 or i386 architecture?
Tim Kientzle пишет:
> We're evaluating Varnish as a possible replacement for our
> installed Squid servers. Performance-wise, Varnish is very
> impressive, and we're pretty pleased with the configuration
> flexibility.
>
> But...
>
> Under heavy load, we're seeing a lo
We're evaluating Varnish as a possible replacement for our
installed Squid servers. Performance-wise, Varnish is very
impressive, and we're pretty pleased with the configuration
flexibility.
But...
Under heavy load, we're seeing a lot of segfaults and
assertion failures. I've pasted an excerpt
I have one site running Plone with lighttpd and Varnish that I set up as
documented here:
http://bitubique.com/content/accelerate-plone-varnish
I have now been asked to set up others substituting Apache2 for lighttpd
by the developers, but haven't been able to find such detailed
instructions fo
In message <3cc6f8100901210758u384af1d4k8091c903614f...@mail.gmail.com>, Nathan
Lenz writes:
>I wonder why my browser is sending an If-Modified-Since header when it
>doesn't really have a copy? I've been running Varnish on a heavily used
>testing server for the past week and I get this from time
Hello,
I have a weird case of Varnish returning a hit with a Length of 0. It
happens when I clear my browser cache and then hit refresh. Varnish returns
a 304 status and my browser shows a blank white page. Here is a snippet of
the varnishlog output:
10 RxHeader c If-Modified-Since: Mon,
Hi Poul,
Can one specify host when purging using command line ?
Thank you.
-Paras
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <8318f61f0901210508i25fb1385w91573182d8cd...@mail.gmail.com>, Audun
> Ytterdal writes:
>>On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <8318f61f0901210508i25fb1385w91573182d8cd...@mail.gmail.com>, Audun
Ytterdal writes:
>On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp
>wrote:
>> In message <75cf5800901210319j1a2741bdp171bdffad920b...@mail.gmail.com>,
>> Paras Fadte writes:
>Does that mean that vcl_miss in this
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <75cf5800901210319j1a2741bdp171bdffad920b...@mail.gmail.com>, Paras
> Fadte writes:
>
>>Does it mean that 200 code doesn't have any relation to the object
>>being or not being there in the cache ? Does it only mean then tha
In message <75cf5800901210319j1a2741bdp171bdffad920b...@mail.gmail.com>, Paras
Fadte writes:
>Does it mean that 200 code doesn't have any relation to the object
>being or not being there in the cache ? Does it only mean then that
>the purge command was successfully executed ?
It only means th
Does it mean that 200 code doesn't have any relation to the object
being or not being there in the cache ? Does it only mean then that
the purge command was successfully executed ?
Thanks .
-Paras
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <75cf5800901210302m5fc06
In message <75cf5800901210302m5fc06acbh2334b0d90df7a...@mail.gmail.com>, Paras
Fadte writes:
>Hi,
>
>When purging object from varnish cache from command line it always
>tends to show 200 0 as the status code even if the object was not
>there in cache ? What could be the reason ?
200 means the pur
Hi,
When purging object from varnish cache from command line it always
tends to show 200 0 as the status code even if the object was not
there in cache ? What could be the reason ?
Thank you.
-Paras
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.l
18 matches
Mail list logo
