hi,
i've searched the mailing lists and looked over the developer section of the
wiki, and haven't found an answer for this yet.
is it possible to preemptively store the response for a given uri without
making a http request to the backend host(s)?
i have a varnish tier with 100 hosts that is
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:01:51PM -0700, Tung Nguyen wrote:
Hi guys,
We're on varnish 2.0.3
It looks like varnish restarts the child process for us every so often,
causing 503s :(. Was wondering if this is a known issue.
Can you check the syslog for any more information?
--
Kristian
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 05:29:23PM -0700, Jauder Ho wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Kristian Lyngstol
krist...@redpill-linpro.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 04:11:04AM -0700, Jauder Ho wrote:
FYI, beresp.ttl does not work on varnish 2.0.4. It does work on -trunk
though.
Sure,
Here's the syslog around one of the times when the child looks like its
crashing.
Apr 8 01:19:00 ey03-s00344 varnishd[2628]: assets.
Apr 8 01:19:00 ey03-s00344 varnishd[2628]: vcl_recv.
Apr 8 01:19:00 ey03-s00344 varnishd[2628]:
/javascripts/responders_1239147022.js?1239147050
Hi DES,
Darryl Dixon - Winterhouse Consulting
darryl.di...@winterhouseconsulting.com writes:
+if (req.http.Pragma ~ .*no-cache.* || req.http.Cache-Control ~
.*no-cache.*) {
+purge_url(regsub(req.url, [?].*$, .*$));
+}
+
It would be interesting to see how often this
hi darryl
i had a simlar problem (varnish child process consuming lots of memory) a
week
ago (see the thread make varnish don't start a subprocess)
the solution for my problem seems to be to use a high-enough cache-size:
starting varnish with
-s file,/tmp/storage,300M
will make the
