2010/1/19 Antoni Villalonga :
> Hi!
>
> I'm looking for a method to invalidate some url.
> http://example.com/invalidate.html, for example.
>
> If I PURGE using 'purge()' function and 2 diferent users GET
> "http://example.com/invalidate.html"; at time, varnish ask for the url to the
> backend serv
2010/1/19 pub crawler :
> Wanted in inject another discussion heady item into this thread and
> see if the idea is confirmed in other folks current architecture.
> Sorry in advance for being verbose.
>
> Often web servers (my experience) are smaller servers, less RAM and
> fewer CPUs than the app s
Hey,
I'm new to Varnish.. We currenly have 4 simple caching balancers running
squid+haproxy in front of some large webapps (2000 req/sec, 200Mbit),
and I get the feeling we're growing out of Squid..
So I am investigating an in-place replacement of Squid by Varnish. The
project looks really great
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> That is why grace is split in two.
> You have obj.grace and req.grace, and the minimum of the two is what
> governs grace mode.
>
Thanks for the clarification. I'll do some experimenting, then update
the documentation at http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/wiki/Perform
In message <4b56.2020...@gmail.com>, Rob S writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > I'm not sure if it's best to have
> > a parameter to vary the behaviour of 'grace', or to have an additional
> > parameter for "max age of stale content to serve".
That is why grace is split in two.
You have obj
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <4b56d2b1.9090...@gmail.com>, Rob S writes:
>
>
>> Our experience of grace is that the first client who requests content
>> after expiry is held up talking to the backend, whilst other subsequent
>> clients get delivered the graced stale content. But, if
In message <4b56d2b1.9090...@gmail.com>, Rob S writes:
>Our experience of grace is that the first client who requests content
>after expiry is held up talking to the backend, whilst other subsequent
>clients get delivered the graced stale content. But, if that's not
>intended, perhaps our conf
]] Rob S
| I'd also caution against replacing, as people may have monitoring
| against the old figures...
Given this number only is displayed in interactive mode and not oneshot
mode, people should not be running automated checks against it. Also,
as this would be quite confusing to people runn
]] "Poul-Henning Kamp"
| In message , John
No
| rman writes:
| >Folks,
| >
| >For the health check (or, ahem, "backend probe," as the docs has it --
| >ouch!), does "health" constitute ability to connect?
| >
| >Or does it check for a 200?
|
| It checks 200
Actually, it checks for .expected_re
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Rob S
>
> | Martin Boer wrote:
> | > I would like to see the following feature in varnish;
> | > during the grace period varnish will serve requests from the cache but
> | > simultaniously does a backend request and stores the new object.
> | >
> | This would also b
]] Rob S
| Martin Boer wrote:
| > I would like to see the following feature in varnish;
| > during the grace period varnish will serve requests from the cache but
| > simultaniously does a backend request and stores the new object.
| >
| This would also be of interest to us. I'm not sure if
]] Martin Boer
| If anyone has a workable workaround to achieve the same results I'm very
| interested.
|
| The reason I would like this feature is because our webshop has almost
| hourly changing prices. This means we can't cache all related pages (or
| not for very long) and at the same tim
Hi,
Netcache devices had the X-Accel-Cache-Control headers in order to
allow an origin server to setup different Cache-Control parameters for
the cache and the end-user.
The netcache will follow the X-Accel-Cache-Control while the end user
will follow the Cache-Control.
I've a few customer using
]] pablort
| Anybody knows what's the plan to release saint mode ? :D
It's in trunk. It's not going to be backported to 2.0 itself as some of
its requirements are not in 2.0 and considered hard to backport without
backporting significant changes from trunk leading to what I believe is
an unacce
14 matches
Mail list logo
