On 23-1-2010 20:57, Michael Fischer wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Angelo Höngens a.hong...@netmatch.nl
mailto:a.hong...@netmatch.nl wrote:
(second try, I found out I was subscribed using a wrong email address)
Hey,
I am having some problems with Varnish.
On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:23 AM, Angelo Höngens wrote:
What is thread_pool_max set to? Have you tried lowering it? We have
found that on systems with very high cache-hit ratios, 16 threads per
CPU is the sweet spot to avoid context-switch saturation.
[ang...@nmt-nlb-03 ~]$ varnishadm -T
On Jan 24, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Angelo Höngens wrote:
According to top, the CPU usage for the varnishd process is 0.0% at 400
req/sec. The load over the past 15 minutes is 0.45, probably mostly
because of haproxy running on the same machine. So I don't think load is
a problem.. My problem is
Can anybody please respond to this query ?
Thank you.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Paras Fadte plf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is prefetch by default enabled in varnish ? I have following in VCL . A
value of -30 seconds would mean that the object would be checked 30 seconds
before its
