In message <282e72051002170852g532cd8acqb570e6db4b829...@mail.gmail.com>, Paul
Wright writes:
>(The cookie header ensures the request is passed through to the
>backend. Curl will respond with "Failure when receiving data from the
>peer".)
How on earth did you get the Range header to be passed th
On 17 February 2010 11:14, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <282e72051002170310g565a26d8s98170fcebb9b2...@mail.gmail.com>, Paul
> Wright writes:
>>On 17 February 2010 10:57, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>>I have pulled the latest revision and can confirm that unlink("/")
>>failed as expected.
In message <282e72051002170310g565a26d8s98170fcebb9b2...@mail.gmail.com>, Paul
Wright writes:
>On 17 February 2010 10:57, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>I have pulled the latest revision and can confirm that unlink("/")
>failed as expected. I ran it briefly and saw this panic:
>
>Child (28554) died
On 17 February 2010 10:57, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <282e72051002170230k7ae8e0c8hc2d5226ca9288...@mail.gmail.com>, Paul
> Wright writes:
>
>>I've compiled with the additional -mt flag, here's my current
>>compilation process:
>
> Please pull a brand new -trunk, I have added a check fo
In message <282e72051002170230k7ae8e0c8hc2d5226ca9288...@mail.gmail.com>, Paul
Wright writes:
>I've compiled with the additional -mt flag, here's my current
>compilation process:
Please pull a brand new -trunk, I have added a check for errno
working and I would like to make sure that passes for
In message <4b7bc0d5.7080...@schokola.de>, Nils Goroll writes:
>> That's another piece of autocrap stuff that needs fixed...
>
>Do you want me to do it?
Send patches!
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer
On 16 February 2010 20:48, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> OK,
>
> It took me a day to liberate a machine to install OpenSolaris on.
>
> Then it took most of a day to remember why I really like FreeBSD
> over Solaris.
>
> Then I got distracted by the failing non-blocking connect to backends
> and ran
Hi Poul-Henning,
> Yeah, we clearly need to improve the autocrap magic a bit to get stuff
> like this right.
Yes. I'm sorry for not having documented this a year ago. Would have saved a
lot
of pain and effort...
> I have added a runtime test now, which panics the child process if the
> errno v
In message <4b7bbdfa.7080...@schokola.de>, Nils Goroll writes:
>Hi Poul-Henning and all,
>
>> We need CFLAGS to contain -mt on solaris, otherwise errno does not
>> get macro-fied to be per-thread.
>>
>> That's where the: EBADF comes from, some entirely different
>> filedescriptor a long time ago,
Hi Poul-Henning and all,
> We need CFLAGS to contain -mt on solaris, otherwise errno does not
> get macro-fied to be per-thread.
>
> That's where the: EBADF comes from, some entirely different
> filedescriptor a long time ago, in the master process...
Fantastic. Thank you for putting so much eff
10 matches
Mail list logo
