Re: Child panics on OpenSolaris

2010-03-04 Thread Paul Wright
On 22 February 2010 18:02, Paul Wright wrote: ... > For anyone else following along I've now had varnish running for over > 5 hours without issue, here are the things I found out: > > * add the Range unsetting code to ensure that such requests don't make > it through t

Re: Child panics on OpenSolaris

2010-02-22 Thread Paul Wright
On 19 February 2010 17:45, Paul Wright wrote: > On 17 February 2010 18:46, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <282e72051002170852g532cd8acqb570e6db4b829...@mail.gmail.com>, >> Paul >> Wright writes: >> >>>(The cookie header ensures the request is p

Re: Child panics on OpenSolaris

2010-02-19 Thread Paul Wright
On 17 February 2010 18:46, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <282e72051002170852g532cd8acqb570e6db4b829...@mail.gmail.com>, Paul > Wright writes: > >>(The cookie header ensures the request is passed through to the >>backend. Curl will respond with "Failure whe

Re: Child panics on OpenSolaris

2010-02-18 Thread Paul Wright
On 18 February 2010 10:08, Paul Wright wrote: > On 17 February 2010 18:46, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <282e72051002170852g532cd8acqb570e6db4b829...@mail.gmail.com>, >> Paul >> Wright writes: >> >>>(The cookie header ensures the request is p

Re: Child panics on OpenSolaris

2010-02-18 Thread Paul Wright
On 17 February 2010 18:46, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <282e72051002170852g532cd8acqb570e6db4b829...@mail.gmail.com>, Paul > Wright writes: > >>(The cookie header ensures the request is passed through to the >>backend. Curl will respond with "Failure whe

Re: Child panics on OpenSolaris

2010-02-17 Thread Paul Wright
On 17 February 2010 11:14, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <282e72051002170310g565a26d8s98170fcebb9b2...@mail.gmail.com>, Paul > Wright writes: >>On 17 February 2010 10:57, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >>I have pulled the latest revision and can confirm that unlin

Re: Child panics on OpenSolaris

2010-02-17 Thread Paul Wright
On 17 February 2010 10:57, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <282e72051002170230k7ae8e0c8hc2d5226ca9288...@mail.gmail.com>, Paul > Wright writes: > >>I've compiled with the additional -mt flag, here's my current >>compilation process: > > Please pu

Re: Child panics on OpenSolaris

2010-02-17 Thread Paul Wright
On 16 February 2010 20:48, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > OK, > > It took me a day to liberate a machine to install OpenSolaris on. > > Then it took most of a day to remember why I really like FreeBSD > over Solaris. > > Then I got distracted by the failing non-blocking connect to backends > and ran

Re: Child panics on OpenSolaris

2010-02-15 Thread Paul Wright
On 13 February 2010 20:26, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I'm still not 100% convinced that EBADF is not me screwing something > up, so I have gone over the poll-waiter and made it even more > paranoid and conservative than before. > > Can I get you to give -trunk r4561 a swing, and see if that chang

Re: Child panics on OpenSolaris

2010-02-15 Thread Paul Wright
On 14 February 2010 17:53, Nils Goroll wrote: > Paul, > > have I missed anything or have you not yet stated which version of > OpenSolaris (uname -v) you're using? If you don't use a standard build, > could you please give the hg changeset you're on? > You're right, I'd forgotten to mention it be

Re: Child panics on OpenSolaris

2010-02-12 Thread Paul Wright
On 12 February 2010 12:37, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <282e72051002120417w6c8ce8bcha2c96a809e9ba...@mail.gmail.com>, Paul > Wright writes: > >>> If so: how long time elapses between the ACK and the RST ? >> >>0.031s > > Interesting. > &

Re: Child panics on OpenSolaris

2010-02-12 Thread Paul Wright
Apologies if this is a duplicate. On 11 February 2010 21:54, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <282e72051002110739y50bc0b16j687bf75692f42...@mail.gmail.com>, Paul > Wright writes: > >>I've had a go at 1.) and have two verbose `snoop` traces during child >>pa

Re: Child panics on OpenSolaris

2010-02-11 Thread Paul Wright
On 10 February 2010 13:53, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <282e72051002100615x701a37a8o416c9af6d1d7f...@mail.gmail.com>, Paul > Wright writes: > >>Thanks for the explanation of what's going on.  Looking at those >>tickets there are suggestions to try the p

Re: Child panics on OpenSolaris

2010-02-10 Thread Paul Wright
On 10 February 2010 13:00, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <282e72051002100305m5d7a0d1fj3a1afac6ea7dd...@mail.gmail.com>, Paul > Wright writes: > > > Hi Paul, > > We have a number of tickets on this issue already (626,615,588). > > The problem is that EBADF

Child panics on OpenSolaris

2010-02-10 Thread Paul Wright
Hello list, Using the Letsgetdugg[1] article I've installed Varnish on an OpenSolaris zone. During testing it works as expected but when it receives production traffic I'm seeing children die with three different types of panics[2][3][4] that look like this: Panic message: Assert error in TCP_no