Am Samstag 07 März 2009 18:52:04 schrieb Sascha Ottolski:
I've just seen a strange restart that heppened this morning, after
only about 25 h runtime;
please ignore the posting, it just came out that the server has a broken
hdd.
Thanks for listening anyway,
Sascha
Am Mittwoch 28 Januar 2009 10:52:47 schrieb Poul-Henning Kamp:
In message 200901260917.45223.ottol...@web.de, Sascha Ottolski
writes:
Assert error in exp_timer(), cache_expire.c line 303:
Condition(oe2-timer_when = oe-timer_when) not true. thread =
(cache-timeout)
[...]
It all happens
Am Montag 12 Januar 2009 05:35:16 schrieb Timothy Ball:
a programming error caused varnish to think there were billions of
pages it had to know about. bug is quashed but varnish doesn't seem
to know
# this is a line from top
3596 0.2 28.3g 28g 3808 256 57m 1916 120 S 20 00
Hi,
bug or feature? The nagios plugin seems not to be able to extract the
uptime:
img-proxy1:~# /usr/local/libexec/check_varnish -p uptime
Unknown parameter 'uptime'
VARNISH UNKNOWN: (null) (3)|uptime=3
but it probably should, shouldn't it?
img-proxy1:~# varnishstat -l 21|grep uptime
uptime
Hi folks,
I'm curious when the next stable (minor) release is planned. I'm
especially interested in
Date: 2008-11-14 01:19:33 +0100 (Fri, 14 Nov 2008)
New Revision: 3390
Modified:
trunk/varnish-cache/lib/libvarnish/binary_heap.c
Log:
Rework the binary heap, we use for expiry processing, to
Hi,
bug or feature? With the new version, my cache file gets shrunk. I made
it with dd with a size of ~259 GB, but after starting varnishd, only
about 119 GB are left. I don't give a size parameter when starting, as
in
-s file,/var/cache/varnish/store.bin
which worked as expected with
Am Montag 20 Oktober 2008 16:59:37 schrieb Sascha Ottolski:
Hi,
bug or feature? With the new version, my cache file gets shrunk. I
made it with dd with a size of ~259 GB, but after starting varnishd,
only about 119 GB are left. I don't give a size parameter when
starting, as in
-s file
on a 4 core machine, running varnish exclusively, all the I/O goes to
one core only:
# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
0: 603869381 0 0 0IO-APIC-edge timer
6: 3 0 0 0IO-APIC-edge
Am Mittwoch 13 August 2008 00:02:07 schrieb Darryl Dixon - Winterhouse
Consulting:
4) Object expires and Varnish goes to fetch it from the backend,
which of course returns 404 or whatever as the URL has expired.
Darryl,
thanks for your reply. This would of course be a straight forward
Am Dienstag 01 Juli 2008 20:16:15 schrieb Skye Poier Nott:
I want to deploy Varnish with very large cache sizes (200GB or more)
for large, long lived file sets. Is it more efficient to use large
swap or large mmap in this scenario?
According to the FreeBSD lists, even 20GB of swap requires
Am Freitag 30 Mai 2008 14:01:35 schrieb Audun Ytterdal:
I run trunk in front of a site. I have 3 varnishservers, all with
32GB
of ram serving only small pictures, thumbnails and profile pictures.
The cacheset is pretty large (1.5 TB) and changing much over time.
And before you all ask why I
Am Donnerstag 29 Mai 2008 17:06:41 schrieb Sascha Ottolski:
Hi,
asked it some weeks ago, but got no answer :-(
when running configure, I see this error:
./configure: line 19292: syntax error near unexpected token
`VARNISHAPI,'
./configure: line 19292: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(VARNISHAPI
) {
set obj.ttl = 7200s;
}
}
so 404 still may happen, but are cached shorter than my default.
Cheers, Sascha
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Sascha Ottolski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
sorry if this is FAQ: what can I do to make varnish respond to
request if it's backend
Am Montag 14 April 2008 14:19:11 schrieb Dag-Erling Smørgrav:
Sascha Ottolski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, the semantics are completely different. With HTTP PURGE, you
do a direct cache lookup, and set the object's TTL to 0 if it
exists
Hi,
I just needed to get rid of about 27,000 stale URLs, that were cached as
404 or 302 due to a configuration error on the backends.
So I did a url.purge in a loop, sleeping 0.1 seconds after each URL:
for i in `cat notfound.txt.sorted` ; do varnishadm -T:81 url.purge $i;
sleep 0.1; done
Hi,
now that my varnish processes start to reach the RAM size, I'm wondering
what a dimension of swap would be wise? I currently have about 30 GB
swap space for 32 GB RAM, but am wondering if it could even make sense
to have no swap at all? My cache file is 517 GB in size.
BTW, the trunk
Am Freitag 04 April 2008 01:32:28 schrieb DHF:
Sascha Ottolski wrote:
however, my main problem is currently that the varnish childs keep
restarting, and that this empties the cache, which effectively
renders the whole setup useless for me :-( if the cache has filled
up, it works great
Am Freitag 04 April 2008 04:37:44 schrieb Ricardo Newbery:
sub vcl_fetch {
if (obj.ttl 120s) {
set obj.ttl = 120s;
}
}
Or you can invent your own header... let's call it X-Varnish-1day
sub vcl_fetch {
Hi,
sorry if this is FAQ: what can I do to make varnish respond to request
if it's backend is dead. should return cache hits, of course, and
a proxy error or something for a miss.
and how can I prevent varnish to cache 404 for objects it couldn't
fetch due to a dead backend? at least I think
Am Freitag 04 April 2008 10:11:52 schrieb Stig Sandbeck Mathisen:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:01:57 +0200, Sascha Ottolski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
I definetely did nothing like this, I've observed restarts out of
the blue. I'm no giving the trunk a try, hopefully there's an
improvement
after checking out and running autogen.sh, configure stops with this
error:
./configure: line 19308: syntax error near unexpected token
`VARNISHAPI,'
./configure: line 19308: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(VARNISHAPI, varnishapi)'
Cheers, Sascha
___
varnish-misc
Am Freitag 04 April 2008 18:11:23 schrieb Michael S. Fischer:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Sascha Ottolski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
you are right, _if_ the working set is small. in my case, we're
talking 20+ mio. small images (5-50 KB each), 400+ GB in total
size, and it's growing
Am Donnerstag 03 April 2008 18:07:53 schrieb DHF:
Sascha Ottolski wrote:
how can this be? My varnish runs for about 36 hours now. yesterday
evening, the resident memory size was like 10 GB, which is still
way below the available 32. later that evening, I stopped letting
request
Am Donnerstag 03 April 2008 18:07:53 schrieb DHF:
how can this be? My varnish runs for about 36 hours now. yesterday
evening, the resident memory size was like 10 GB, which is still
way below the available 32. later that evening, I stopped letting
request to the proxy over night. now I
Am Donnerstag 03 April 2008 19:30:25 schrieb Michael S. Fischer:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Sascha Ottolski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
All this with 1.1.2. It's vital to my setup to cache as many
objects as possible, for a long time, and that they really stay in
the cache
Am Dienstag 01 April 2008 21:15:11 schrieb Sascha Ottolski:
thanks very much, this was very helpful. now, could anyone give me a
hint how to interpret the output of varnishhist?
I'm seeing
client_req 15054 123.39 Client requests received
cache_hit 1632
Hi,
I'm a bit puzzled by the examples and the explanation of the default
vcl config presented in the man page. Now I'm wondering, if I want to
make my first steps for creating a reverse proxy for static images
only, that basically should cache everything indefinetely (as long as
cache space
Am Dienstag 01 April 2008 17:42:17 schrieb DHF:
Sascha Ottolski wrote:
Hi,
I'm a bit puzzled by the examples and the explanation of the
default vcl config presented in the man page. Now I'm wondering,
if I want to make my first steps for creating a reverse proxy for
static images only
Am Dienstag 18 März 2008 00:07:59 schrieb Michael S. Fischer:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:32 PM, DHF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is called CARP/Cache Array Routing Protocol in squid land.
Here's a link to some info on it:
http://docs.huihoo.com/gnu_linux/squid/html/x2398.html
It
Hi,
probably a stupid question, but if I'd like to use more recent features
like the load-balancer, and since the latest official release is a bit
dated, is there anything like a snapshot release that is worth giving
it a try, especially if my configuration will hopefully stay simple for
a
Am Sonntag 16 März 2008 15:54:42 schrieben Sie:
Sascha Ottolski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now my question is: what kind of hardware would I need? Lots of RAM
seems to be obvious, what ever a lot may be...What about the disk
subsystem? Should I look into something like RAID-0 with many disk
Michael,
thanks a lot for taking the time to give me such a detailed answer.
please see my replies below.
Am Sonntag 16 März 2008 18:00:42 schrieb Michael S. Fischer:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Sascha Ottolski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The challenge is to server 20+ million image
Hi,
I'm relatively new to varnish (I'm having an eye on it since it appeared
in public, but so far never really used it). Now the time may have come
to give it whirl. And am wondering if someone could give me a little
advise to get me going.
The challenge is to server 20+ million image files,
33 matches
Mail list logo
